Offshore abuse

Posted on

The FT has reported:

Hutchison Telecommunications International, the Hong Kong-based company, has booked a tax-free windfall of HK$69.3bn (US$8.9bn) from the sale of its Indian mobile phone arm to Vodafone.

Tim Pennington, HTIL chief financial officer, said because the transaction involved the sale of "one off-shore vehicle to another off-shore vehicle", the company was advised it did not have to make any provisions for capital gains tax.

The one-off gain accounted for almost all of HTIL's first-half net profit of HK$70.1bn, compared with HK$2m in the same period last year.

Someone, somewhere will, I hope, have noted that India is not offshore. The value in this gain arose in the Indian economy, and that economy has a right to benefit from tax due on this sale. Under my definition of tax compliance that would be required.

It is a pernicious company that denies income to a state where almost a quarter of the 1.1 billion people live on less than $1 a day; 700 million more live on less than $2 a day.

If you want evidence that offshore tax abuse facilitates poverty, then this is it.


Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:

You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.

And if you would like to support this blog you can, here: