<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Tax Research UK</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog</link>
	<description>Richard Murphy on tax and economics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:38:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Redknapp by Richard Murphy</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2012/02/08/redknapp/comment-page-1/#comment-611291</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/?p=14057#comment-611291</guid>
		<description>Sure

No problem now</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure</p>
<p>No problem now</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Redknapp by Richard Murphy</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2012/02/08/redknapp/comment-page-1/#comment-611290</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/?p=14057#comment-611290</guid>
		<description>Unless it&#039;s a gift....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unless it&#8217;s a gift&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Redknapp by Stephen Griffiths</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2012/02/08/redknapp/comment-page-1/#comment-611289</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Griffiths</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/?p=14057#comment-611289</guid>
		<description>Hi RM
Payments into an offshore bank account-  I always reckon if it looks like a duck,swims like a duck and quacks like a duck- it is a duck- don&#039;t you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi RM<br />
Payments into an offshore bank account-  I always reckon if it looks like a duck,swims like a duck and quacks like a duck- it is a duck- don&#8217;t you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Redknapp by Stephen Griffiths</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2012/02/08/redknapp/comment-page-1/#comment-611288</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Griffiths</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/?p=14057#comment-611288</guid>
		<description>Dear RM
My employer likes me very much, he wants to pay me a nice big gift, can he pay it tax free into my Offshore bank account, in the name of my cat?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear RM<br />
My employer likes me very much, he wants to pay me a nice big gift, can he pay it tax free into my Offshore bank account, in the name of my cat?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on If you&#8217;re going to prosecute by Chris Foren</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2012/02/09/if-youre-going-to-prosecute/comment-page-1/#comment-611287</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Foren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/?p=14061#comment-611287</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not quite correct to say Redknapp was found innocent. He was found not guilty. 
That&#039;s not the same thing. It means that the jury were not convinced beyond reasonable doubt about one or more ingredients of the prosecution&#039;s case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not quite correct to say Redknapp was found innocent. He was found not guilty.<br />
That&#8217;s not the same thing. It means that the jury were not convinced beyond reasonable doubt about one or more ingredients of the prosecution&#8217;s case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The American right wing turn on the old &#8211; and it&#8217;s a trend we&#8217;re bound to see copied by Philip</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2012/02/07/the-american-right-wing-turn-on-the-old-and-its-a-trend-were-bound-to-see-copied/comment-page-1/#comment-611285</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/?p=14024#comment-611285</guid>
		<description>Is it really an interview if you&#039;re speaking to one of your own columnists?..  Just how impaired do your critical faculties have to be to believe this stuff?  Wait, don&#039;t answer that!..

Anyway, I&#039;d be delighted to know what the difference between an &#039;entitlement program&#039; (&#039;boo, hiss&#039;) and a &#039;real safety net&#039; is.  (This is the kind of begged question a real interviewer would raise.)  I think I can guess though: the latter is a market fundamentalist sham with no other purpose than to destroy the former.

I mean, are people entitled to the safety net or not?!  If so then it&#039;s an entitlement, if not then it&#039;s not much of a safety net.

It&#039;s obviously a propaganda piece, barely concealing its agenda behind a thin veneer of neutrality but she really betrays herself when asked &#039;what would you do?&#039; - her eyes roll, she looks off to the side, sneers slightly and you can see the disgust and megalomania in her eyes where she declares that she&#039;d destroy it all.  Nasty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it really an interview if you&#8217;re speaking to one of your own columnists?..  Just how impaired do your critical faculties have to be to believe this stuff?  Wait, don&#8217;t answer that!..</p>
<p>Anyway, I&#8217;d be delighted to know what the difference between an &#8216;entitlement program&#8217; (&#8216;boo, hiss&#8217;) and a &#8216;real safety net&#8217; is.  (This is the kind of begged question a real interviewer would raise.)  I think I can guess though: the latter is a market fundamentalist sham with no other purpose than to destroy the former.</p>
<p>I mean, are people entitled to the safety net or not?!  If so then it&#8217;s an entitlement, if not then it&#8217;s not much of a safety net.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s obviously a propaganda piece, barely concealing its agenda behind a thin veneer of neutrality but she really betrays herself when asked &#8216;what would you do?&#8217; &#8211; her eyes roll, she looks off to the side, sneers slightly and you can see the disgust and megalomania in her eyes where she declares that she&#8217;d destroy it all.  Nasty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Green today&#8217;s quantitative easing by Simon Proctor</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2012/02/09/green-todays-quantitative-easing/comment-page-1/#comment-611284</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Proctor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/?p=14069#comment-611284</guid>
		<description>There is that, and that&#039;s why I asked. It&#039;s just a thought I had. I&#039;m all in favour of the Green QE plan, sounds good. I was just thinking out loud or something to that effect.

I also like the ideas on making it easier to start a limited liability small business (having been involved with two new companies over the years making it easier would be great).

Keep up the good work and all that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is that, and that&#8217;s why I asked. It&#8217;s just a thought I had. I&#8217;m all in favour of the Green QE plan, sounds good. I was just thinking out loud or something to that effect.</p>
<p>I also like the ideas on making it easier to start a limited liability small business (having been involved with two new companies over the years making it easier would be great).</p>
<p>Keep up the good work and all that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Green today&#8217;s quantitative easing by John Palmer</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2012/02/09/green-todays-quantitative-easing/comment-page-1/#comment-611283</link>
		<dc:creator>John Palmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/?p=14069#comment-611283</guid>
		<description>Richard Werner does understand our banking system and let us hope that our politicians listen to him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard Werner does understand our banking system and let us hope that our politicians listen to him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on If you&#8217;re going to prosecute by Richard Murphy</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2012/02/09/if-youre-going-to-prosecute/comment-page-1/#comment-611282</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/?p=14061#comment-611282</guid>
		<description>I also looked at prosecution rates

They have stopped altogether in Scotland</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also looked at prosecution rates</p>
<p>They have stopped altogether in Scotland</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Redknapp by alastair harris</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2012/02/08/redknapp/comment-page-1/#comment-611281</link>
		<dc:creator>alastair harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/?p=14057#comment-611281</guid>
		<description>if only I had it to give!!!  

You have to remember that football clubs are run by individuals who typically have immense personal wealth.  And not too many clubs are run on a traditional business model.

I suppose you might also consider some of the comments Mr Redknap came out with in court.

After which you might conclude footballers don&#039;t live in the &quot;real world&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if only I had it to give!!!  </p>
<p>You have to remember that football clubs are run by individuals who typically have immense personal wealth.  And not too many clubs are run on a traditional business model.</p>
<p>I suppose you might also consider some of the comments Mr Redknap came out with in court.</p>
<p>After which you might conclude footballers don&#8217;t live in the &#8220;real world&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on If you&#8217;re going to prosecute by john</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2012/02/09/if-youre-going-to-prosecute/comment-page-1/#comment-611280</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/?p=14061#comment-611280</guid>
		<description>There are two remedies of CH for failure to file, the civil penalty and prosecution of the directors.

Your report principally addressed the civil penalties.

I think that prosecution, and publicity would encourage compliance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are two remedies of CH for failure to file, the civil penalty and prosecution of the directors.</p>
<p>Your report principally addressed the civil penalties.</p>
<p>I think that prosecution, and publicity would encourage compliance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Jersey really does permit sham trusts by Mark Morris</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2012/02/08/jersey-really-does-permit-sham-trusts/comment-page-1/#comment-611279</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/?p=14054#comment-611279</guid>
		<description>Obviously the definition of &quot;beneficial owner&quot; of the EU savings tax applies only to EU-residents. So of course if settlor and beneficiary is a mythical mid-East Sheik like all Jersey trustees proclaim, then the EUSD won&#039;t apply.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously the definition of &#8220;beneficial owner&#8221; of the EU savings tax applies only to EU-residents. So of course if settlor and beneficiary is a mythical mid-East Sheik like all Jersey trustees proclaim, then the EUSD won&#8217;t apply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Green today&#8217;s quantitative easing by Richard Murphy</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2012/02/09/green-todays-quantitative-easing/comment-page-1/#comment-611278</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/?p=14069#comment-611278</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s Simon Jenkins idea

What about people without bank accounts? 

And why simply boost consumption from China

What&#039;s the benefit in that for us?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s Simon Jenkins idea</p>
<p>What about people without bank accounts? </p>
<p>And why simply boost consumption from China</p>
<p>What&#8217;s the benefit in that for us?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Jersey really does permit sham trusts by Richard Murphy</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2012/02/08/jersey-really-does-permit-sham-trusts/comment-page-1/#comment-611277</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/?p=14054#comment-611277</guid>
		<description>Doesn&#039;t matter under these new rules....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t matter under these new rules&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Redknapp by Richard Murphy</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2012/02/08/redknapp/comment-page-1/#comment-611276</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/?p=14057#comment-611276</guid>
		<description>Maybe

Why?

When did you last give someone a grand?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe</p>
<p>Why?</p>
<p>When did you last give someone a grand?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

