The following comes from the blog of Eurodad, a fellow member with Tax Research UK of the Task Force on Financial Integrity and Economic Development:

An imminent “withholding tax treaty”, will allow Germany to claw back some revenue from tax evasion, but it will also protect Swiss bank secrecy and undermine the prospect of automatic information exchange globally, and more specifically the EU European Savings Tax Directive (EUSTD).

Switzerland and Germany will conclude the deal on 10th August, according to German and Swiss newspapers. A withholding tax will be charged on income from savings and investments of German citizens with Swiss accounts, i.e those who had previously evaded tax in Germany. There will be both a one-off payment for lost income in the past, paid initially by Swiss banks, and then an ongoing tax on interest and return on capital.  However, the withholding tax will be returned anonymously, thereby protecting Swiss banking secrecy.

The one-off compensation for past lost earnings could raise between 1.8 Billion and 10 billion according to different estimates, and will be paid for by Swiss banks initially, who will be reimbursed if Germany can make individuals pay up.

Actually obtaining the ongoing revenue is likely to be difficultas in many cases account holders can dodge these rules by moving money between Switzerland and other tax havens. Equally, the German government is probably being naïve in trusting the Swiss authorities and banks to collect taxes for them. Tax Research UK point out that Switzerland is a country that “has a proven record of facilitating crime, and being utterly indifferent to it. And that has consciously and deliberately withheld information from other governments for decades.

Britain has been in negotiations with Switzerland for a similar deal, and other countries might well follow suit, with France and Spain currently considering it.

The actual tax rate has still to be finalised but it is likely to amount to around 25-26%. This is less than the EUSTD, and will therefore undermine the initiative. EUSTD requires member states except holdouts to automatically provide other members states with information, but this only applies to wealthy individuals’ interest income. For example, Holland would have to automatically provide France with the details of any interest paid by Dutch banks to French citizens. This interest would then be taxed at 35%, from which Holland would keep a quarter and France the rest. The Swiss-German treaty will strengthen the hand of holdouts Austria and Luxembourg, who also pay anonymous withholding taxes rather than sharing information. It seems Switzerland has been pursuing the withholding tax deals precisely because they undermine the EUSTD, and damage the prospects of other international automatic information exchange deals.

Hat tip: Mark Morris

 
GuardianJobs is carrying the following advertisement:

JOURNALIST/MEDIA OUTREACH

The Task Force on Financial Integrity and Economic Development is looking for an experienced journalist in a fast-paced, exciting field which is now attracting major international media attention worldwide. The Task Force is a consortium of governments and research and advocacy organisations seeking greater transparency in the global financial system.

The journalist will be expected to work closely with experts who are working to promote financial transparency and accountability for the benefit of developing countries.

The journalist will consult with experts to prepare materials, and will connect journalists with experts. This position will based in the UK, ideally in London or with easy access to London

A counterpart journalist will be based in Washington DC, and close liaison will be important. The post holder will be supported by a supervisory group.

This initiative is supported by the Tax Justice Network and the person appointed will work closely with the director of its International Secretariat and other team members, as well as other members of Task Force member organisations.

Main responsibilities

  • Turn Task Force materials into lively, readable copy for journalists and for public audiences
  • Write and place timely op-eds and blogs relating to current news items
  • Identify and cultivate media contacts on Task Force issues
  • Inform journalists about illicit financial flows, bank secrecy, tax evasion and corruption, and help them with story ideas
  • Coordinate closely with task force members

Knowledge required

  • Excellent general knowledge of target media markets
  • Significant contacts in print, broadcast and online media
  • Working knowledge of new media
  • Some familiarity with (and high enthusiasm to learn about) illicit financial flows, tax evasion, corruption, bank secrecy and related issues

Skills/ Personal Qualities

  • Strong news sense
  • Ability to write clear and accurate copy to deadline
  • Ability to respond and work well under pressure and to prioritise workload and to multi-task
  • Proven team player with a ‘can-do’ approach
  • Strong networking and interpersonal skills
  • Ability to work without close supervision and take the initiative

Other requirements

  • Extensive experience working as a journalist
  • Experience of pitching stories to journalists and editors across a range of media
  • Fluency in English is essential; French, German, Portuguese and/or Spanish would be a plus

If interested, please email a cover letter, résumé and list of published work. Applications should be submitted by 1 July, 2011 to liz(at)taxjustice.net.

 

Tax Research LLP is a member of the Task Force on Financial Integrity & Economic Development so I’m delighted to share the notice for its 2011 Annual Conference. This is:

Tackling the Shadow Financial System
A Working Plan for the G20

October 6-7 | Cercle National des Armées | Paris, France

As the Task Force says:

The 2011 annual conference of the Task Force on Financial Integrity and Economic Development will take place at the Cercle National des Armées in Paris, France from October 6-7.

Illicit financial outflows from developing countries—which total around $1.3 trillion per year—undermine the tax base in poorer countries, eroding the accountability that is essential for good governance and global stability. The same opacity that facilitates these flows is also partly responsible for the budget crises that are plaguing governments in developed countries, which the G20 has been trying to address. The key to curtailing these illicit flows is transparency. Specifically, the G20 should adopt recommendations in its communiqué that would increase the flow of information between multinational corporations, governments, and citizens – across developing and developed countries. Such financial transparency is the key to limiting future crises and to promoting economic growth across the world.

Speakers and panelists at this year’s conference will address the implications of and solutions to the shadow financial system, including: country-by-country reporting, beneficial ownership of accounts, automatic exchange of tax information, curtailment of trade mispricing, and tax evasion as a predicate offense for anti-money laundering. Breakout sessions will focus on the 2011 Financial Secrecy Index, illicit trafficking, socially responsible investing, media messaging, the “Arab Spring”, and more. Together, speakers and participants will craft a message to the G20 member governments ahead of the November 2011 French summit on how they can address the global ills that result from illicit financial flows.

Click here to register for the conference and view a copy of the agenda.

I’ll see you there.

 

 

I am in the US to talk about country-by-country reporting at Yale University.

The slides I’ll be using are here.

As I say in them:

—CBC is a new way of looking at the MNC

—It is in essence a demand for a profit and loss account and limited balance sheet for each country in which the MNC trades

‚ÄîBut it’s also something much more than that

‚ÄîThis is an accounting system that roots the corporation in the countries that host it – and not somewhere floating above them

‚ÄîAnd this is accounting that says the MNC is an entity in its own right with responsibilities all of its own – it’s not just an agent for its owners

What are those responsibilities?

—To meet need, and so make profit

‚ÄîTo do so sustainably or we wouldn’t invest in it

—To do no harm

—To settle its obligations

—To be accountable for doing so

—To be honest in that accounting

But that means it is accountable to:

—The equity investor group (shareholders);

—The loan creditor group (banks and bondholders);

—The analyst-adviser group who advise the above groups;

—Business partners;

—Consumers;

—Employees;

—The surrounding community;

—Civil society organizations; and

—Governments and their institutions.

And it is precisely because of this diversity that is both universal, and without exception local, that we need country-by-country reporting.

The rest is on the slides.

And here.

With thinks to the Task Force on Financial Integrity and Economic Development for inviting me over for this event.

 

The above comment has just been made by a senior government official at the Task Force conference in Bergen.

How right he is.

And he followed up by saying that if the three premises of economics are wrong – there is imperfect information, high transaction costs and irrationality – then making clear what we’re saying combats these failures by reducing asymmetry of information is vital.

And transparency he says is key – and reiterates a point I make often – this is because we will all be better off with it. But this requires a change in broader mindset which government won’t deliver.

Which is why he says what we’re doing in the Task Force on Financial Integrity and Economic Development is so vital. As a continuing presence, investing in this space, we provide the vital counterbalance to governments based on reaction to issues when the underlying failure is systemic.

 

It’s an interesting coincidence (no more, I think) that the Guardian has published an article this morning on tax havens / secrecy jurisdictions by William Brittain-Catlin.

He argues that tax havens may be on the back foot right now as a result of the crash. But he also argues that not nearly enough is being done to highlight their role in that crisis and that as a result they’ll be back in force if concerted action is not taken now.

As he says:

[N]ew offshore centres will emerge – the bets are already on Malta, Mauritius and the Seychelles – as trailblazers for the second coming of offshore capitalism, and they will give those hungry for profit and inordinate wealth a margin of risk and reward not available in the slumbering onshore world.

The outcome we know already: offshore capitalism will destroy our economies in a repeat performance of all that we have witnessed these last few years.

But this need not happen; the economic gods have not determined our fate. With the removal of tax havens and offshore finance from the world, we can safely and securely build a new onshore polis. The responsibility is ours. We can and must determine our own fate.

We have a choice.

And we have to choose to beat tax havens.

 

The Task Force on Financial Integrity and Economic Development is discussing beneficial ownership. As Elise Bean from the Senate Committee on Investigations says the problem is:

•U.S. states form nearly 2 million new corporations and LLCs each year, without knowing who owns them.

•The failure to collect ownership information invites wrongdoers to misuse U.S. companies for terrorism, money laundering, tax evasion, or other crimes.

The Tax Justice Network got into mighty trouble last year for naming the US as the world’s premier secrecy jurisdiction. But the truth is that TJN was right.

And the US knows it.

There is a choice here and as ever it’s a simple one. Who matters more in this world? Crooks or honest people? The right to abuse or the right uphold the rule of law?

You’d think the answer was obvious, as indeed it is. But far too many support the crooks.

Including all the world’s secrecy jurisdictions.

Which is why the Task Force highlights this issue as key to tackling illicit financial flows.