These are my links for March 27th:
- ¬´Steuerhinterziehung kostet Leben¬ª – News Wirtschaft: Konjunktur – tagesanzeiger.ch – .
Herr Murphy gets about – even to Switzerland
These are my links for March 27th:
These are my links for March 20th through March 26th:
Read the rest.
And not a word from them on tax havens, I note
Rightly so.
These are my links for March 17th through March 24th:
And not a word from them on tax havens, I note
Rightly so.
Callous indifference I call it
Dire economics to.
These are my links for March 16th through March 20th:
And he thinks it is time for change. Radical change.
The times they really are a changing. Welcome on board Andrew
Mind you – I’m open to offers
These are my links for March 18th through March 19th:
And it seems to mention me.
These are my links for March 13th through March 18th:
And why isn't the Isle of Man mentioned?
This won't do.
It will be a condition of your Euro bail out…
Three cheers for the Guardian!
I'm not so sure – I'd have said Germany had a tax haven priority and it is not listed
Would you trust them to honour their commitments?
No, nor would I.
"The Swiss are trying to gain time," Nicolas Michellod, an analyst with the Zurich office of with Celent, a international financial research firm. "Negotiating new tax treaties with each country will take years."
He said that could give opponents of the measure on the Swiss right, whom he described as feeling aggrieved by the international criticism, a chance to drag out any changes to the banking laws until the issue moved out of the headlines."
I can tell him. The answer is no
Rightly so: this sort of thing has to be ended for good and middle England rightly dislikes it
Are they going to call Sarkozy, Merkel, Brown and Obama militants next?
They're on our side
But the media can't quite get their heads round that yet.
So theme tact would help.
"Liechtenstein will go not so far as to abolish bank secrecy. But the principality will co-operate more fully with foreign tax authorities and will end the confusing distinction, also retained by Switzerland, between tax evasion, a civil offence, and tax fraud, a crime."
That's progress.
But it's only limited progress.
We will demand more. And rightly so. Bank secrecy is, after all, a crime against humanity at large.
Don't believe me? Ask all those who have suffered the despoliation of their nations as they loot funds for the benefit of their Swiss and Lichtenstein bank accounts.
A billion voices can bring testimony to support my case.
Just not possible.
And where is the money?
These are my links for March 12th through March 16th:
"The Swiss are trying to gain time," Nicolas Michellod, an analyst with the Zurich office of with Celent, a international financial research firm. "Negotiating new tax treaties with each country will take years."
He said that could give opponents of the measure on the Swiss right, whom he described as feeling aggrieved by the international criticism, a chance to drag out any changes to the banking laws until the issue moved out of the headlines."
I can tell him. The answer is no
Rightly so: this sort of thing has to be ended for good and middle England rightly dislikes it
Are they going to call Sarkozy, Merkel, Brown and Obama militants next?
They're on our side
But the media can't quite get their heads round that yet.
So theme tact would help.
"Liechtenstein will go not so far as to abolish bank secrecy. But the principality will co-operate more fully with foreign tax authorities and will end the confusing distinction, also retained by Switzerland, between tax evasion, a civil offence, and tax fraud, a crime."
That's progress.
But it's only limited progress.
We will demand more. And rightly so. Bank secrecy is, after all, a crime against humanity at large.
Don't believe me? Ask all those who have suffered the despoliation of their nations as they loot funds for the benefit of their Swiss and Lichtenstein bank accounts.
A billion voices can bring testimony to support my case.
Just not possible.
And where is the money?
Discuss.
Does a £750 fine have any meaning for PWC?
These are my links for March 11th through March 13th:
“Liechtenstein will go not so far as to abolish bank secrecy. But the principality will co-operate more fully with foreign tax authorities and will end the confusing distinction, also retained by Switzerland, between tax evasion, a civil offence, and tax fraud, a crime.”
That’s progress.
But it’s only limited progress.
We will demand more. And rightly so. Bank secrecy is, after all, a crime against humanity at large.
Don’t believe me? Ask all those who have suffered the despoliation of their nations as they loot funds for the benefit of their Swiss and Lichtenstein bank accounts.
A billion voices can bring testimony to support my case.
Just not possible.
And where is the money?
Discuss.
Does a £750 fine have any meaning for PWC?
That at least will set the cat amongst the pigeons.
And no more can it be argued that this is focussed only on non-OECD states
The American Right at it’s best, or worst, on the issue of tax havens
What’s amazing is that this is the rhetoric and reporting those running these places believe. I know – I’ve heard them say so
Very unlikely
I know how much work they put into this
See www.undue-diligence.org for more
These are my links for March 11th:
The measures used to assess 45% of the world’s wealth were wrong
Something quite different
They’re wrong – and they know it, but want to preserve their privelige