Jon Worth has published one of the best attempts I have seen to explain what might happen now on Brexit on Twitter. Get your head around this:
The answer is, no one knows. But the potential for things to go wrong is enormous.
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:
Wow!
So this is what a clusterfuck REALLY looks like.
Sheesh…………………….!
@Pilgrim.
I think Richard is being parsimonious ….
🙂
(One nil)
That’s what austerity means….
“That’s what austerity means….”
Austerity should not be condoned.
Have one yourself 🙂
I was so tempted…..
“I was so tempted…..”
Hmmmm….. I’m with Wilde. ‘I can resist anything except temptation’
Apparently you are more comfortable with St Paul’s rather more austere. ‘Yield not to temptation, for yielding is sin’.
(Motto of the Colston’s Girls school in Bristol, I believe. More honoured in the breach than the observance by at least one alumni :-))
Clusterbourach for the Scots thank you very much…!
Just when you think it can get no worse, May thinks up some other devious scheme to extend her ‘life’, just you wait and see.
Sorry but I don’t have a PHD in rail tracks design.
Marie Thomas says:
“Sorry but I don’t have a PHD in rail tracks design….”
I’ve been fortunate recently to swap my laptop for a large screen desktop. This enables me to see virtually the whole layout at once. If I couldn’t, as has usually been the case in the past, like you, I would have given up.
It’s an interesting way of tracking options….First time I’ve ever really made sense of such a device and understood its merits.
It does not, however fill me with joy, but that is to with the content rather than the method.
I am lucky to have both….
And a desktop does help with things like that
I don’t like the odds on some of Jon’s probabilities.
I wish I thought he’d got them wrong.
It ought to be reassuring to see the probability of a ‘No Deal’ Brexit being so low, but given that No Deal is an oxymoron – it simply isn’t possible to have no deal…. by my reckoning, I’m dismayed that at this stage in the proceedings it features on the chart at all and in the thinking of our political (in)decision-makers.
I tried to follow the logic of the graph, but easily became confused – then it dawned on me, that was probably the idea all along 🙁
No, it wan’t
It was intended to show complexity