As the Guardian has just reported:
George Osborne's budget promise to fund a clampdown on tax [avoiders and] evaders appears to be under threat after a leaked memo showed that HM Revenue & Customs is to lose up to 300 [specialist] staff this year.
Mary Aiston, HMRC's director of specialist tax, which targets high-end taxpayers and complex cases, has written that the jobs from the unit will go by 2015 — and adds that those who remain will be asked to deliver more revenue with less resources.
PCS, the union that represents the majority of HMRC staff sent me this press release relating to this issue:
Ministers' rhetoric on tax avoidance undermined by fresh cuts
The government's claim to be clamping down on tax avoidance is undermined by fresh job cuts to specialist staff, the Public and Commercial Services union says.
HM Revenue and Customs has announced that up to 17% of jobs in its specialist personal tax (SPT) division will go this year because they "are being challenged to deliver more with less", according to a senior manager.
The union says this indicates a shift away from chasing the wealthier taxpayers and more complex cases, and comes as 23 staff in the Edinburgh office of HMRC's high net worth unit learned this morning their office will close.
One week ago, as part of an effort to head off anger over corporate tax avoidance, chancellor George Osborne said in his budget speech: "I am increasing HMRC's budget to tackle non-compliance."
But in a message to SPT staff, director Mary Aiston explains that in 2014/15 about 250-300 jobs will go and that the target for the amount of tax they collect is less than they are likely to bring in this financial year.
PCS general secretary Mark Serwotka said: "The rhetoric from the government on the need to tackle tax avoidance, which deprives our economy of tens of billions of pounds every year, is completely undermined by its actions.
"Instead of investing in the department that collects the taxes that fund the public services we all rely on, it is making it harder to chase down these wealthy individuals and organisations."
As the Guardian note:
The chancellor unveiled a series of measures in the autumn statement designed to close tax-avoidance loopholes that were hoped would raise £6.8bn. However, the Treasury select committee said earlier this month that the forecasts were "inherently extremely uncertain".
Cutting staff is the one way to guarantee HMRC fail. It's the option they are choosing.
Disclosure: I advise PCS, but had nothing to do with this story
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:
HMRC bosses no longer see the department’s main function as collecting the right amount of tax. They just see their prime directive as cutting their own staff. HMRC is devoted to self-harm.
Mark Serwotka is a brilliant man
It is not even about collecting CORRECT tax. Government is just asking to collect whatever it wants. Without proper resource at HMRC it will all the more difficult for everyone. All upfront payment request will have to be calculated accurately and will take time.
This is the best illustration that all the rhetoric we saw in the past to the effect that private business is the model for public service is mere smoke.
In any business,we are told, the idea is to invest so as to increase returns to profit: and that continues until something near the break even point. That is central to the neoclassical conception of how the world wags (it is arrant nonsense, IMO: but that need not detain us because it is one of the “theoretical” underpinnings of the neoliberal policies we all have to endure)
So if we apply that idea to HMRC we should be recruiting tax inspectors. At present each inspector brings in much more money that he costs to employ and while that is true the department should be expanding its staff and its “business”
But for some reason the purely theoretical analysis which is held to be self evident in other spheres is automatically abandoned when it comes to its application in one of the very few government departments where it could apply. Funny, that