Larry Summers, writing in the FT this morning has noted why it is inevitable that state spending will rise in the future. He says there are four reasons for this.
First of all there's demography.
Second, interest rates will rise and so will debt servicing costs (I point I don't wholly agree with).
Third, the cost of government provided services are rising much faster than inflation in general. Automation is reducing the cost of many private sector supplies and you can't automate large chucks of tat the government does. There are no productivity gains to be had in them, so their relative cost is rising.
Fourth costs like infrastructure renewal can't be put off forever.
And then he adds, having noted all this:
There is a steady decline in the fraction of tax returns that are audited and there is evidence of growing tax non-compliance. Both are a reflection of unsustainable cuts in spending.
Quite so.
There's a vicious circle going on now encouraging a spiral of decline that will arrest all hope in our economy and society at large.
Unless we address this: unless we accept more tax will be due; unless we tackle the tax gap our societies will fail. Not maybe; inevitably.
That's why I campaign on these issues.
That's why I am so offended by libertarian views that seek to destroy everything of value.
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:
Also, energy, water and a couple of other things being delayed. We could be in for a repeat of the 1974 nightmare after local government reorganisation. The new authorities found all to often that their predecessors had spent up the reserves, not done maintenance and repairs and not put money into maintenance reserves either. Add to that to in the political wrangling all sorts of popular ways of spending and making future commitments had left costs for the future. Can you remember what happened next? I can, it wasn’t very nice.
Did you read about Ian Duncan Smurf and his attack on, of all people, Larry Summers’ ex-student, Stephanie Flanders in the Daily Mail? Why Ian Hyphenated Surname got all cloacal with his metophors is anyone’s guess.
I assume that the large number of 16, 18, and 21/22 year olds now going from academic institutions into trying to get paid work will produce a bulge in the unemployment numbers.