The cult of subprime central bankers ¬´ Real-World Economics Review Blog.
Dean Baker on the IMF, why they were wrong, why they are wrong and why they should be held accountable.
I just have a suspicion it won’t happen though.
Which is criminal.
The cult of subprime central bankers ¬´ Real-World Economics Review Blog.
Dean Baker on the IMF, why they were wrong, why they are wrong and why they should be held accountable.
I just have a suspicion it won’t happen though.
Which is criminal.
From Larry Elliott in the Guardian today:
Ultimately, the problem with the meta-narratives [such as free amrket capitalism and Europe] is that they don’t deliver. The postwar era of strong trade unions, full employment policies and capital controls produced stronger, more equitable growth than three decades of deregulation, liberalisation and flexible labour markets. The more integrated Europe has become, the worse it has performed.
China and India prove that it is possible to thrive without a meta-narrative. Both countries have systems of managed capitalism fully in the tradition of the mixed economies that prevailed in the west during the heyday of social democracy. What counts is what works. There is a lesson in that somewhere.
I think it is “bring on the Green New Deal”.
Larry Elliott is one of my co-authors of the Green New Deal.
It beggars belief that when everything in education is to be cut Michael Gove has the temerity to announce an exemption: the profit his friends may make from exploiting the state may increase – this time by running schools.
I am appalled.
Some seem surprised I am so angry with David Laws. These letter writers to the Guardian would not be; especially the last who hits the nail on the head with remarkable succinctness:
Even in Yeovil there are people who claim housing benefit, and local MP David Laws must have constituents who have been refused HB because South Somerset district council believed they have a "contrived tenancy" in which "their liability to pay rent has been created to take advantage of the HB scheme". You can’t get HB if your landlord is a relative or a partner. Some of Mr Laws’s constituents may even have faced prosecution for fraud because they tried to do so. What’s the moral or legal difference?
Pete Ruhemann
Reading, Berkshire
‚Ä¢ I for one wouldn’t care if he was in a relationship with a green Martian, but object with rage at the idea that yet another of our great and good politicians turns out to be a cheat.
Kathleen Hines
Some may have noticed I am not a great fan of cheats.
Nor, I am pleased to say is Polly Toynbee who deals with another dimension of the issue quite adroitly:
On resigning, David Laws said: "How much I regret having to leave such vital work, which I feel all my life has prepared me for." How odd that his relished life goal was to cast people out of work.
I regret the manner of his fall, but not the departure of one who expressed little sympathy for the lives of others being damaged by a too harsh interpretation of economic necessity.
Quite so.
And in glossing over his cheating (for that is what it was) I note the Tories willingly apply one rule to their own and another to those whose lives they are seeking to destroy: those on benefit in this country.
And yes, that does sicken me.
And I’m happy to say it.
Will Hutton is in sombre and appropriate mood in the Observer:
The future of Europe is in the balance. The potential disintegration of the euro will be a first-order economic and political disaster. Economically, it will plunge Europe into competitive devaluations, debt defaults, bank bailouts, frozen credit flows, trade protection and prolonged stagnation. Politically, whatever resolve there is to hold our disparate continent together, where the old enmities and suspicions are never far from the surface, will evaporate.
He is right: collapse is what is in prospect.
And he’s also right:
Germany….is looking on with horror. It was the Reichsbank printing money that created hyperinflation and led, in part, to national socialism. [But n]ow, the European Central Bank is about to embark on the same course. What the European Union is turning into is a “transfer union” complains Chancellor Angela Merkel, echoing her right-wing tabloid press, taking money from hard-working Germans to bail out feckless Greeks, Spaniards and Portuguese.
That point is vital: a politician constrained by the phobia of a press blinded to reason is useless in this scenario. Despite which:
European governments have a matter of months – maybe weeks – to find a way of making the euro a credible currency.
The trouble is that all these solutions [proposed] involve more Europe, not less, and Europe’s political leaders, especially the Germans, are not in the market for more Europe. The Germans have issued their own stern, unbending, nine-point plan: Europeans, in short, need to become more German and if they don’t, they should leave the EU.
But:
Not everybody can build a manufacturing export machine. Somebody has to be an importer.
Precisely.
There is only one solution:
The least bad option, as the IMF’s chief economist, Olivier Blanchard, has recently argued, is a modest and targeted increase in inflation. He suggests an inflation target of 4%.
This is what we will have to do in Britain. It is also what would save the euro. Germany will soon have to decide what it wants – a hard currency and a broken Europe or a compromised currency and a Europe that holds together. It is a decision that will affect all our lives and I’m not optimistic that Germany will make the right choice.
Hutton reflects what I have been writing.
Inflation of European collapse?
It’s a no-brainer.
And I fear the choice will be collapse.
And that leaves me worried for my sons.
Generations were wiped out for such error in the past.
Hat tip to George Irvin
David Laws will bounce back from resignation, say senior Conservatives | Politics | guardian.co.uk .
If there’s anyone mourning the end of one of the shortest cabinet careers ever I think they need to seek professional help.
David Laws fulfilled all my expectations of the Orange Book Liberals: cold, ruthless, uncaring willingness to inflict harm on the ordinary people of this country in pursuit of a bankrupt mantra based on economic ineptitude: extreme in the nineteenth century; unpalatable beyond imagination now.
Worse than that, the excuse offered for his deception is clear evidence of a cold, calculated and deliberate abuse based on fine reading of the rules and the use of the mindset of the tax avoider: that the spirit of the law may be legitimately abused.
I am delighted this man has been exposed for such abuse.
May any others who have done the same follow in his path.
This mentality needs to be consigned to history – and this government with it.
His excuses reveal he must have known what his doing, and it is inconceivable that a man of his training did not: he deserves the certain destruction of his career that will follow.
This government knows the harm it plans to unleash on this country: they deserve the same fate.
Capital gains tax will not raise extra money, economists say – Telegraph.
The Telegraph reports:
The Adam Smith Institue, studing CGT changes in America from 1955 to 2006, has calculated that every time the rate was cut revenues went up, and every time.
Now I wonder why they looked at the USA when the proposal being made here is that CGT be changed so that it is paid at the taxpayers highest marginal income tax rate.
Nigel Lawson did that in 1988. As a result we have a case study on whether it worked or not reasdilty available.
The stats are here.
The yield rose by 68%.
Odd that the Adam Smith Institute didn’t spot that.
And odd that a body that campaigns against tax should so vigorously oppose an increase that they say will not increase yield.
Could it be that the ASI aren’t letting on to what they really know?
Conventional Madness – Paul Krugman Blog – NYTimes.com.
It’s comforting to find one’s self in the company of Martin Wolf and Paul Krugman in a day, both with regard to the madness of the OECD Economic Outlook report.
As Krugman notes in the NYT:
It’s a terrifying document.
Why? Not because it offers a grim prospect, although it does ‚Äî although the OECD has marked up its growth projections, it’s still forecasting extremely high unemployment for years to come.
No, what’s scary is the utter folly that now passes for respectable opinion.
And his explanation:
What’s so scary about this is that the OECD virtually defines conventional wisdom; it’s a numbered-paragraph sort of place, where a committee has to sign off on everything, policing the nuances as they say. So what we get from this [report] is that among sensible people the idea that you should undermine recovery to appease those who think there might be inflation even though actually there isn’t has become conventional wisdom ‚Äî so conventional that it’s treated as self-evident.
This is really, really bad.
I agree.
Insanity is taking over the markets.
banks and business are demanding cuts that can only harm them – to the point of destroying much of the private sector.
And the majority of economists – yet again- applaud this insanity.
Will we ever learn?
Or is the collective memory of less than two years now?
Hat tip to Howard Reed
Government boycotts Question Time over Alastair Campbell appearance | Media | The Guardian .
The ConDems really are proving themselves a) inept in the media b) very illiberal:
The BBC has accused the government of political interference after it refused to provide a ministerial guest for Question Time unless Alastair Campbell was removed as a panellist.
BBC executives said they rejected the demand and tonight’s show went out without a representative from the coalition government.
Gavin Allen, the show’s executive editor, posted a blog on the BBC website saying No 10 had insisted that Tony Blair’s former director of communications was replaced by a shadow cabinet member. “Very obviously we refused,” Allen wrote, “and as a result no minister appeared, meaning that the government was not represented on the country’s most-watched political programme in Queen’s speech week – one of the most important moments in the parliamentary calendar.”
Couldn’t they handle him?
That’s ridiculous.