Home > HMRC, Tax gap > Tax, not cuts to plug public deficit

Tax, not cuts to plug public deficit

January 6th, 2010

Tax, not cuts to plug public deficit.

AccountingWEB reports:

HMRC should focus less on spending cuts and more on chasing the £130bn in uncollected, evaded and avoided taxes, says the Public and Commercial Services Union.

The union warned that the main political parties were engaged in a bidding war over who could cut the most, whilst the government was losing billions to tax cheats.

The PCS estimates that £70bn is lost through tax evasion, while £25bn is lost through avoidance. It blamed some 25,000 job cuts at HMRC and plans to close 200 offices by 2011 for the £2.7bn rise in uncollected taxes last year.

“Job cuts in HMRC illustrate the short sightedness of crude cuts where staff chasing tax have been axed, even though they recoup £600,000 each after staff costs. It is no coincidence that as HMRC staff have been cut, the amount of uncollected tax written off as doubtful has nearly doubled,” said Mark Serwotka, general secretary of the PCS.

PCS data on tax lost comes from my work.

Data on uncollected tax is something they specialise in though. And from my discussions with them it appears to me this is one of the big, and unrecognised aspects of the tax gap.

Why won’t HMRC employ enough people to collect tax known to be due? Surely tax justice and being being fair to honest tax payers demands that action be taken?

Richard Murphy HMRC, Tax gap

  1. James from Durham
    January 6th, 2010 at 16:15 | #1

    There is an infuriating lack of consistency in the way that HMRC treats those with unpaid tax. Some can carry on for years without any bother at all even when the tax runs into thousands. Others will be pilloried for unpaid tax with threats of bailiffs etc, even when they have real business problems. I am all for tax being collected, but there has to be some consistency of approach.

    • January 6th, 2010 at 16:29 | #2

      James

      Entirely agreed

      Officially no debt of less than £10,000 should be chased

      Yet bigger sums remain outstanding and smaller ones are pursued with vigour

      And why a different scale altogether for tax credits?

      Richard

  2. Jersey Girrl
    January 7th, 2010 at 11:01 | #3

    Both HMRC and HM Treasury have become increasingly politicised at senior levels. It is more important to the mandarins to act like Uriah Heep with ministers than to do what statute requires of them.

    The Girrl

  3. James from Durham
    January 7th, 2010 at 11:37 | #4

    Richard, where is it written down that debts of less than £10000 should not be chased?

  4. January 7th, 2010 at 13:38 | #5

    @James from Durham

    It is not

    But I’m told it is policy by many senior people…

    And it’s mad

    That’s a lot of the self employed

    R

Comments are closed.