Tax havens for the super-rich to consider – Times Online .

The above article is one of many in the press highlighting the potential increase in tax haven business now 1% of the UK population (or less) will have a small part of their income taxed at 50%.

It’s curious: none seem to note the fact that UK resident and domiciled individuals are taxable on their world wide income and setting up offshore trusts and companeis to hide invetsment income is exceptionally hard to do fuch a person, legally.

Do they realise that many of those who use tax havens to get round their obligations are evading tax?

And right now there’s an amnesty and crackdown recommencing on those who have done just that?

I’m really not sure that those writing this stuff know what they’re talking about.

 

My friend and colleague, Raymond Baker of Global Financial Integrity has written in the FT about India’s hidden offshore cash. He said (in part):

India’s opposition party leader L.K. Advani sparked a political conflagration with pre-election campaign remarks that India was losing tens of billions of dollars each year in illicit financial outflows, or “black money”. He asserted that the National Democratic Alliance would vigorously pursue recovery of these lost assets if voted into power. With the rolling election now in progress, the issue of India’s missing billions has grown progressively thornier, as both sides vie to take the moral high ground.

Whatever the outcome of the election, India’s problem has broader implications both for the developing world and for efforts by the Group of 20 developed and developing nations to craft an effective post-crisis economic plan for the global financial system.

In his discussion of black money, Mr Advani cited our estimates of illicit capital flight, which suggest total illicit outflows from the developing world of $1,000bn (€766bn, £684bn) a year. India ranked fifth highest at $22bn-$27bn a year, coming in behind Russia ($32bn- $38bn), Mexico ($41bn-$46bn), Saudi Arabia ($54bn-$55bn) and China ($233bn-$289bn).

The proceeds of criminal activity, corruption and corporate tax evasion, these flows are clandestine in nature and usually end up in financial centres featuring low regulation and high secrecy. This makes it tricky to study illicit financial flows.

India is the latest of several nations to raise the alarm about illicit capital flight. Following high-profile scandals involving Liechtenstein and Switzerland, the Group of 20 nations has demanded greater co-operation in tackling the shadow financial system. Made up of tax havens, jurisdictions allowing secrecy, disguised corporations, anonymous trust accounts, fake foundations and assorted money-laundering mechanisms, it is designed to move money and obscure its sources.

As world leaders and high-level stakeholders meet this weekend in Washington, the question of India’s black money should be considered as a sign of what lies ahead. The global recession is expected to have a severe impact on developing economies and undo years of poverty alleviation efforts and economic gains. The desire to offset this predicted impact is sincere. But until efforts are made to dismantle the shadow financial system and mandate more co-operative and rigorous reporting, success will remain as elusive as India’s missing black money.

India has shown that this issue resonates with voters. Politicians in other developing country democracies would be wise to take note.

Raymond is right. This is not just an academic issue, or a technical issue. It is a political issue, for developing and developed countries alike.

A hope the world leaders take note. The G20 was but step one.

 

I have interests in life beyond tax.

Ipswich Town is one of them, for better (and usually) worse.

The BBC has reported the aoppointment of Roy Keane as the Town’s new manager.

Should be interesting. And a diversion form what lies ahead in the economy. For which I should probably be grateful.

 

Accountancy Age say:

DSG International (Dixons) has been told it was in breach of transfer pricing guidelines, however, a settlement is yet to be agreed upon between the retailer and HM Revenue and Customs.

Observers believe DSG could end up owing the taxman hundreds of millions of pounds.

In a 62 page document, special tax commissioners John Avery Jones and Charles Hellier outlined the decision, which has centred on the insurance of extended warranties and whether business facilities provided were set according to a standard market rate.

This is vey good news.

The tax haven campaign is important, as is the focus on evasion.

But the challenge to transfer pricing abuse is more important still.

It’s good to see a breakthriough here.

 

Take the Sir out of Sir Fred Goodwin, MP urges civil service chief .

You have to say he has a point.

Given that it was awarded for services to banking……

 

There was much in the budget that was depressing, not least as one commentator on this blog has noted:

It appears that the line the media are taking is that the mess we are in is all Labour’s fault. Whilst I am very critical of Labour indeed, there seems to have been a decision taken that we should all forget that it was in fact the banks that created this catastrophe.

I think that is fair comment. There’s no doubt Gordon Brown’s legacy is not good. But he can’t be responsible for it all.

And there were signs of progress from a tax point of view e.g. para 5.85 on charities:

Budget announces further informal consultation with the sector to develop new rules based around an effective anti-avoidance purpose test.

There can be little doubt a new approach to tax avoidance is being developed.

I welcome that.

 

Fee boost expected from uncertainty in offshore centres – Accountancy Age

As G20 leaders seek to bring an end to international tax havens, accountants can expect plenty of business from clients beginning to re-think the way they use offshore jurisdictions.

Do accountants ever lose?

You can see why clients love us.

 

FT.com / US / Politics & Foreign policy – Obama moves to fulfil credit card fees pledge.

This is a Senator Carl Levin favourite issue.

If this goes thrugh then I’d put a high chance on the Stop Tax haven Abuse Act too.

Apr 222009
 

From the budget:

Meeting carbon budgets will require a transformation of the way the UK meets its energy needs. The Government’s existing framework will enable a ten-fold increase in renewable investment by 2020. To protect investment and jobs in low-carbon energy, and to strengthen the long-term framework for a low-carbon energy future, Budget 2009 announces:

  • £405 million to support low-carbon industries and advanced green manufacturing, to help make the UK a worldwide leader;
  • that UK renewable and energy projects stand to benefit from up to £4 billion of new capital from the European Investment Bank, removing blockages in project financing;
  • an uplift in support for offshore wind investments that reach financial close between now and 2011 through the Renewables Obligation. This is expected to support £9 billion of investment and power up to 2.8 million homes;
  • extending support for combined heat and power through climate change levy exemptions, helping bring forward £2.5 billion of investment and 3 GW of capacity by 2015, and supporting employment; and
  • a new funding mechanism to support up to four carbon capture and storage demonstration projects, and £90 million to fund detailed preparatory studies.

Actual investment by the government seems to be about £0.5 billion.

Far, far, far too little.

© 2005 - 2011 Tax Research UK.
Some rights reserved. Creative Commons License
Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha