<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Tax Gap methodology is valid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/06/06/the-tax-gap-methodology-is-valid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/06/06/the-tax-gap-methodology-is-valid/</link>
	<description>Richard Murphy on tax and corporate accountability</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 05:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Markus Meinzer</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/06/06/the-tax-gap-methodology-is-valid/#comment-446147</link>
		<dc:creator>Markus Meinzer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 13:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/06/06/the-tax-gap-methodology-is-valid/#comment-446147</guid>
		<description>Harry,

I have never seen any value-added in the squabbling about the essentials of labels; deploying them as red herring is much ore common. 

Be it 'right wing' or not, the facts remain the same: redistribution usually is not carried out via the market, but - if at all - by the state [which is against libertarian creed]; at the same time, redistribution is seldom the outcome of rightist political groups and/or their policies [right-wing]. Hence, there is at least no flagrant contradiction between the labels 'libertarian' and 'right-wing' on this issue. And this issue is at stake when it comes to appropriate corporate taxation practices.

Markus</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harry,</p>
<p>I have never seen any value-added in the squabbling about the essentials of labels; deploying them as red herring is much ore common. </p>
<p>Be it &#8216;right wing&#8217; or not, the facts remain the same: redistribution usually is not carried out via the market, but - if at all - by the state [which is against libertarian creed]; at the same time, redistribution is seldom the outcome of rightist political groups and/or their policies [right-wing]. Hence, there is at least no flagrant contradiction between the labels &#8216;libertarian&#8217; and &#8216;right-wing&#8217; on this issue. And this issue is at stake when it comes to appropriate corporate taxation practices.</p>
<p>Markus</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tax Research LLP</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/06/06/the-tax-gap-methodology-is-valid/#comment-445812</link>
		<dc:creator>Tax Research LLP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 19:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/06/06/the-tax-gap-methodology-is-valid/#comment-445812</guid>
		<description>Very politely Harry, you would no doubt ask me to justify a claim that the Pope was a Catholic.

I have time for real issues: none for time wasters.

It's not can't: it's won't be bothered with libertarian time wasters</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very politely Harry, you would no doubt ask me to justify a claim that the Pope was a Catholic.</p>
<p>I have time for real issues: none for time wasters.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not can&#8217;t: it&#8217;s won&#8217;t be bothered with libertarian time wasters</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry Haddock</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/06/06/the-tax-gap-methodology-is-valid/#comment-445763</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Haddock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 16:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/06/06/the-tax-gap-methodology-is-valid/#comment-445763</guid>
		<description>Er, so in other words ~ you cannot actually justify your statement that it is a 'right wing ideology' at all, other than mumbling something about wikipedia (which points out that it isn't).

Interestingly, wikipedia also has articles on  how the moon landings were faked, and that 9/11 was an inside job. Go figure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Er, so in other words ~ you cannot actually justify your statement that it is a &#8216;right wing ideology&#8217; at all, other than mumbling something about wikipedia (which points out that it isn&#8217;t).</p>
<p>Interestingly, wikipedia also has articles on  how the moon landings were faked, and that 9/11 was an inside job. Go figure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tax Research LLP</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/06/06/the-tax-gap-methodology-is-valid/#comment-445754</link>
		<dc:creator>Tax Research LLP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 16:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/06/06/the-tax-gap-methodology-is-valid/#comment-445754</guid>
		<description>Harry

Please pull the other one

I have better things to do than argue with common knowledge

Try Wikipedia if you really think that libertarianism is not associated with right wing thinking

Richard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harry</p>
<p>Please pull the other one</p>
<p>I have better things to do than argue with common knowledge</p>
<p>Try Wikipedia if you really think that libertarianism is not associated with right wing thinking</p>
<p>Richard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry Haddock</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/06/06/the-tax-gap-methodology-is-valid/#comment-445750</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Haddock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 15:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/06/06/the-tax-gap-methodology-is-valid/#comment-445750</guid>
		<description>We're not discussing what is wrong with libertarianism, we are challenging your lazy asscertaion that it is 'right wing'

Let us start with you outlining how the belief that ones sexual life is ones own business is a 'right wing' concept, then you can follow on with explaining the belief that freedom from authoritarian governments is also a 'right wing' idea.

You can then go on to explain how opposition to corporatism is a 'right wing' idea.  You can finish up with an explanation of how opposition to the idea that the state has domain over your mind and body is a 'right wing' idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re not discussing what is wrong with libertarianism, we are challenging your lazy asscertaion that it is &#8216;right wing&#8217;</p>
<p>Let us start with you outlining how the belief that ones sexual life is ones own business is a &#8216;right wing&#8217; concept, then you can follow on with explaining the belief that freedom from authoritarian governments is also a &#8216;right wing&#8217; idea.</p>
<p>You can then go on to explain how opposition to corporatism is a &#8216;right wing&#8217; idea.  You can finish up with an explanation of how opposition to the idea that the state has domain over your mind and body is a &#8216;right wing&#8217; idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tax Research LLP</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/06/06/the-tax-gap-methodology-is-valid/#comment-445745</link>
		<dc:creator>Tax Research LLP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 15:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/06/06/the-tax-gap-methodology-is-valid/#comment-445745</guid>
		<description>Harry

Oh yes I do

Where shall we start with what's wrong with it?

Richard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harry</p>
<p>Oh yes I do</p>
<p>Where shall we start with what&#8217;s wrong with it?</p>
<p>Richard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry Haddock</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/06/06/the-tax-gap-methodology-is-valid/#comment-445736</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Haddock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 14:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/06/06/the-tax-gap-methodology-is-valid/#comment-445736</guid>
		<description>'who, I believe considers himself a libertarian right winger and so carries with him all the baggage that goes with those labels'



You just don't understand classical liberalism, do you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;who, I believe considers himself a libertarian right winger and so carries with him all the baggage that goes with those labels&#8217;</p>
<p>You just don&#8217;t understand classical liberalism, do you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Logical Errors and Empirical Errors</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/06/06/the-tax-gap-methodology-is-valid/#comment-445684</link>
		<dc:creator>Logical Errors and Empirical Errors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 11:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/06/06/the-tax-gap-methodology-is-valid/#comment-445684</guid>
		<description>[...] we&#8217;re back with Richard Murphy again. Here is (part of) his response to my laterst [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we&#8217;re back with Richard Murphy again. Here is (part of) his response to my laterst [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
