<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Questions for Bill Dodwell</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/06/06/questions-for-bill-dodwell/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/06/06/questions-for-bill-dodwell/</link>
	<description>Richard Murphy on tax and corporate accountability</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 10:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tax Research UK / Bill Dodwell is busy</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/06/06/questions-for-bill-dodwell/#comment-448751</link>
		<dc:creator>Tax Research UK / Bill Dodwell is busy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 07:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/06/06/questions-for-bill-dodwell/#comment-448751</guid>
		<description>[...] Age has noted my challenge to Bill Dodwell, head of tax at Deloittes, and put it on its back [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Age has noted my challenge to Bill Dodwell, head of tax at Deloittes, and put it on its back [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tax Research UK / Who will pay corporation tax? That is the question</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/06/06/questions-for-bill-dodwell/#comment-446907</link>
		<dc:creator>Tax Research UK / Who will pay corporation tax? That is the question</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 10:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/06/06/questions-for-bill-dodwell/#comment-446907</guid>
		<description>[...] So, all they would appear to disagree with me about is whether the difference might be called avoidance or not. And if that&#8217;s all the difference is about it certainly doesn&#8217;t justify calling the work &#8216;rubbish&#8216;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So, all they would appear to disagree with me about is whether the difference might be called avoidance or not. And if that&#8217;s all the difference is about it certainly doesn&#8217;t justify calling the work &#8216;rubbish&#8216;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Georges</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/06/06/questions-for-bill-dodwell/#comment-445775</link>
		<dc:creator>Georges</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 17:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/06/06/questions-for-bill-dodwell/#comment-445775</guid>
		<description>While I am no Bill Dodwell I will have a go at answering #1:

Q: Why is the effective rate so much lower than statutory rates?
A: Allowances legally enacted by Parliament</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I am no Bill Dodwell I will have a go at answering #1:</p>
<p>Q: Why is the effective rate so much lower than statutory rates?<br />
A: Allowances legally enacted by Parliament</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Worstall</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/06/06/questions-for-bill-dodwell/#comment-445762</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Worstall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 16:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/06/06/questions-for-bill-dodwell/#comment-445762</guid>
		<description>"Why is the effective rate so much lower than statutory rates?"

Could it be that government, via Parliament, writes into tax law specific things that deliberately lower the effective tax rates for companies below the statutory rates?

R&#38;D tax relief, first year allowances, pension contribution allowances, capital allowances, intangible assets allowances......?

You know, these things that govt. tries to get companies to do by offering them tax breaks if they do so?

No?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Why is the effective rate so much lower than statutory rates?&#8221;</p>
<p>Could it be that government, via Parliament, writes into tax law specific things that deliberately lower the effective tax rates for companies below the statutory rates?</p>
<p>R&amp;D tax relief, first year allowances, pension contribution allowances, capital allowances, intangible assets allowances&#8230;&#8230;?</p>
<p>You know, these things that govt. tries to get companies to do by offering them tax breaks if they do so?</p>
<p>No?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
