<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Corporation tax cust will not boost the economy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/06/05/corporation-tax-cust-will-not-boost-the-economy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/06/05/corporation-tax-cust-will-not-boost-the-economy/</link>
	<description>Richard Murphy on tax and corporate accountability</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 03:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rory Meakn</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/06/05/corporation-tax-cust-will-not-boost-the-economy/#comment-445320</link>
		<dc:creator>Rory Meakn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 13:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/06/05/corporation-tax-cust-will-not-boost-the-economy/#comment-445320</guid>
		<description>That a tax cut is deficit-financed is a bad thing in so far as it means that taxes will have to be higher than necessary in future in order to pay back that debt. But...

* A deficit-financed tax cut may also prompt future governments to reduce the bloat in the government, aka "starve the beast".
* The "plethora of tax breaks" serves to distort people's choices. Politicians who dreamed up these wheezes are almost certain to be wrong about imposing them upon their subjects.
* Abolishing the breaks will mean the economy will need fewer tax accountants and tax inspectors. These bright individuals could be retrained to do something productive instead of merely working round politicians' inanities.
* The beneficial effects of removing the disincentives and waste of corporate taxation would be augmented if such tax cuts were bolstered by reducing government spending, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That a tax cut is deficit-financed is a bad thing in so far as it means that taxes will have to be higher than necessary in future in order to pay back that debt. But&#8230;</p>
<p>* A deficit-financed tax cut may also prompt future governments to reduce the bloat in the government, aka &#8220;starve the beast&#8221;.<br />
* The &#8220;plethora of tax breaks&#8221; serves to distort people&#8217;s choices. Politicians who dreamed up these wheezes are almost certain to be wrong about imposing them upon their subjects.<br />
* Abolishing the breaks will mean the economy will need fewer tax accountants and tax inspectors. These bright individuals could be retrained to do something productive instead of merely working round politicians&#8217; inanities.<br />
* The beneficial effects of removing the disincentives and waste of corporate taxation would be augmented if such tax cuts were bolstered by reducing government spending, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Tax Gap</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/06/05/corporation-tax-cust-will-not-boost-the-economy/#comment-445295</link>
		<dc:creator>The Tax Gap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 11:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/06/05/corporation-tax-cust-will-not-boost-the-economy/#comment-445295</guid>
		<description>[...] Here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
