I have been asked this question yet again today. I have a five step plan:
1) Increase the tax threshold at which tax is paid by £1,000 for everyone. For most people this will reduce their tax liability by £200 - the value that (near enough) the 10p band gave them;
2) Reduce the standard rate band by £1,000. This will increase the tax take for those on higher rate by £200. This will leave them no better or worse off by these changes. That's fair. This is not meant to effect them, but will save more than £2 billion in tax.
3) Ensure all capital gains made on disposals of assets held for less than a year are subjected to income tax without offset of the CGT allowance. This might easily raise £1 billion: I suspect rather more since I have shown in the Missing Billions that 17% of all capital disposals are of assets held for less than a year;
4) Deem that all asset sales by a spouse or civil partner who received the asset as a gift from their spouse/partner in the year preceding sale are treated as being disposals by then original owner to stop gains shifting between partners. I suspect this will raise more than £0.5 billion.
5) Ensure that every stock broker in the UK has to automatically supply data on share sales made by a UK resident person to HMRC. At present share sales of little more than £5 billion a year are reported to HMRC, which is implausible when more than £250 billion of shares are held by UK resident individuals. Automatic reporting would massively increase capital gains compliance. I suspect more than enough would be raised to pay for the cut in income tax for all taxpayers now on the basic rate band, costing about £4 billion a year.
It's radical, simple and progressive. It's what the Labour Party should be doing. I suspect someone else will propose it.
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
There are links to this blog's glossary in the above post that explain technical terms used in it. Follow them for more explanations.
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:
Buy me a coffee!
[…] Tax Research UK / How to pay for the 10p tax rate clawback – Logical and fair so well worth considering […]
Hi Richard,
Re your asset disposal proposal, I can see that causing bad feeling when it interacts with inheritance tax, as follows:
– Beneficiary of an estate needs to sell an asset from, or part of, that estate – e.g. a valuable painting – to pay IHT.
– Because they’ve owned that asset for less than a year they will pay IT on it instead of CGT, i.e. much more tax.
So I can see people saying, “They’re taxing us so that we can’t afford to pay tax”.
How would you reply to that please?
M
M
I’m not sure that this follows.
CGT is cancelled by an IHT paid on death and the ebenficiary gets at market value on death for CGT purposes. If they sell within a year the gain will probbaly be quite small so making this a very minor issue, and probbaly not an issue at all.
And of course, they would only pay tax on any gain made since death, so they could afford to pay: this would be theirs.
I can’t see the problem with that
R
Hi Richard,
I follow you – so the gain would be small because it would only be the difference between the market value at time of death / inheritance and the market value at time of sale?
My fault entirely, I got confused. Apologies.
M
M
The person who has not made a mistake has not lived
🙂
R
[…] Yesterday I suggested how Alastair Darling should deal with the 10p tax rate problem. […]