Home > Tax Havens > Space havens

Space havens

April 1st, 2008

News has leaked that as a consequence of Germany’s plans to block tax haven abuse a consortium of international firms is, quite literally, launching an alternative. It’s the space haven.

The consortium, known apparently by the name KPWDY, is planning to set up a tax haven on a satellite orbiting the earth. As they are reported to have said:

This creates opportunities for tax planning that are out of this world.

And, they stress, it’s wholly legal as well, and they think entirely beyond challenge.

Apparently the standard tax haven structure of a trust owning a company which in turn will operate a bank account that will settle the debit card bills run up by the settlor of the whole arrangement will all be available from the satellite facility - and not a single human will have to play a single part in supplying the service.

All the facilities that one would usually expect of a tax haven administrator will be undertaken automatically by the computers on board the satellite. These will always act in accordance with the instructions given to them by the trust settlor who will, as is now common place on earth, have full reservation of powers with regard to the whole structure being that human interference of a real trustee is quite unnecessary since they have no role in the arrangement other than loan of their name. In that case the space satellite option will use incorporated nominees, all of whom will have signed complete non-disclosure agreements requiring that they never make enquiry as to the identity of the entities for whom they act. It’s considered invincible.

To add to the appeal of the arrangement it is thought that a complete bank will also be hosted on the satellite with all transactions being run, again, by the settlor.

The only question apparently left to resolve is whether companies and trusts set up in space will be able to transact here on earth. But it’s not likely to be an issue of much concern to all involved, not so long as the debit card bills continue to be paid and a margin is earned all round. If that’s done then it’s reported that stellar profits are expected.

Richard Murphy Tax Havens

  1. Gareth
    April 1st, 2008 at 10:38 | #1

    Well, that story’s more credible than the post on http://baumanblog.sovereignsociety.com/ , where the promoters of off shore tax havens today were compared to the abolitionists of the 19th century. That would have been a great joke, if it hadn’t been posted on the 25th March.

  2. April 1st, 2008 at 12:44 | #2

    Remarkable story. What will they think of next. On the subject of astonishing events, see our own incredible piece of news about chimps are self assessment at http://www.accountancyage.com/accountancyage/news/2213191/chimps-succeed-self-assessment

  3. Mark
    April 1st, 2008 at 16:27 | #3

    Couldn’t the same be accomplished with a ship sailing permanently in international waters?

  4. Trevor Smith
    April 1st, 2008 at 20:58 | #4

    Very good, Richard, though I’m not sure you should be giving anybody ideas… :lol:

    …and even if we hadn’t noted the date, we could tell it’s not a genuine posting - no links to various papers, nor condemnations of the “news” story in question (although I guess if you did some of your enemies would accuse of you falling for your own joke…)

    Nice try though…

  5. Emily Coltman
    April 2nd, 2008 at 10:55 | #5

    Richard, is this an April Fool’s gag?!

    M

  6. A Marshall
    April 3rd, 2008 at 00:37 | #6

    April Fool Richard!

  7. April 5th, 2008 at 12:34 | #7

    The sad thing is that this was, of course, an April Fool, but it’s horribly close to reality, so unbelieveable is most tax haven activity.

    And Mark is right - this could be achieved here on earth by a ship sailing in international waters.

    Richard

  8. Gareth
    April 7th, 2008 at 09:30 | #8

    Mark,

    Someone thought of that plan about ten years ago ! http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/87458.stm - I’m not sure what happened to it though. Then of course, there was the off-shore off-licence idea: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/tees/3566920.stm . That more or less failed when it had to put into port for repairs…

Comments are closed.