<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A note to the Far Right</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/03/19/a-note-to-the-far-right/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/03/19/a-note-to-the-far-right/</link>
	<description>Richard Murphy on tax and corporate accountability</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 07:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tax Research LLP</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/03/19/a-note-to-the-far-right/#comment-401452</link>
		<dc:creator>Tax Research LLP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 11:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/03/19/a-note-to-the-far-right/#comment-401452</guid>
		<description>Mr Eugenides

If it appeases you, I'll apologise for my casual indifference towards the ideological nuances of the Far Right. 

It is howver an indifference that I am sure many would share. More than that, I'll go so far as to say that well over 90% of the supporters of the TPA would have no idea if it is libertarian, NeoCon or some other flavaour of anti-society extreme. 

And it's that threat to society that does worry me, and many others.

It's also notable that not even the Tories think that any one of you have made a case for tax cuts right now.

Why is that, I wonder? Could it be that there is no logic to your arguments, no support for your ideology and no democratic prospect of them ever holding sway?

I rest my case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr Eugenides</p>
<p>If it appeases you, I&#8217;ll apologise for my casual indifference towards the ideological nuances of the Far Right. </p>
<p>It is howver an indifference that I am sure many would share. More than that, I&#8217;ll go so far as to say that well over 90% of the supporters of the TPA would have no idea if it is libertarian, NeoCon or some other flavaour of anti-society extreme. </p>
<p>And it&#8217;s that threat to society that does worry me, and many others.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also notable that not even the Tories think that any one of you have made a case for tax cuts right now.</p>
<p>Why is that, I wonder? Could it be that there is no logic to your arguments, no support for your ideology and no democratic prospect of them ever holding sway?</p>
<p>I rest my case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr Eugenides</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/03/19/a-note-to-the-far-right/#comment-401437</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Eugenides</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 10:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/03/19/a-note-to-the-far-right/#comment-401437</guid>
		<description>I'm pretty sure no-one's asking you to care, Mr Murphy. All they ask is a basic minimum of accuracy. 

For example, I don't "care" whether you advocate a higher tax rate of 40%, 50% or 98%. But if I claimed the latter when your position is actually the former, you'd tell me I didn't know what I was talking about. And you'd be correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure no-one&#8217;s asking you to care, Mr Murphy. All they ask is a basic minimum of accuracy. </p>
<p>For example, I don&#8217;t &#8220;care&#8221; whether you advocate a higher tax rate of 40%, 50% or 98%. But if I claimed the latter when your position is actually the former, you&#8217;d tell me I didn&#8217;t know what I was talking about. And you&#8217;d be correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Longrider &#187; Pompous Prig</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/03/19/a-note-to-the-far-right/#comment-401415</link>
		<dc:creator>Longrider &#187; Pompous Prig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 09:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/03/19/a-note-to-the-far-right/#comment-401415</guid>
		<description>[...] response was uncalled for. And, as is the case with human nature, when one has behaved badly, one tends to justify it&#160;by digging in deeper &#8211; in this case with a &#8220;note to the far right&#8221;. Except [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] response was uncalled for. And, as is the case with human nature, when one has behaved badly, one tends to justify it&nbsp;by digging in deeper &ndash; in this case with a &ldquo;note to the far right&rdquo;. Except [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
