<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My del.icio.us bookmarks for February 27th</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/02/28/my-delicious-bookmarks-for-february-27th/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/02/28/my-delicious-bookmarks-for-february-27th/</link>
	<description>Richard Murphy on tax and corporate accountability</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 01:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: john b</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/02/28/my-delicious-bookmarks-for-february-27th/#comment-391430</link>
		<dc:creator>john b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/02/28/my-delicious-bookmarks-for-february-27th/#comment-391430</guid>
		<description>Sorry, I introduced an ambiguity while trying to be brief. What I mean is that ABI does not define tax-reducing offshore structures as a sign of bad governance, whether or not you believe them to be a sign of bad governance, and therefore it's misleading to suggest that the ABI report finds a correlation between poor performance and tax-reducing offshore structures.

[isn't the reason all major corporate failures have involved an offshore element simply because all major corporates *have* an offshore element? They've also all involved computers and people in suits, but it'd be hard to say that these were key factors in those firms' downfall...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I introduced an ambiguity while trying to be brief. What I mean is that ABI does not define tax-reducing offshore structures as a sign of bad governance, whether or not you believe them to be a sign of bad governance, and therefore it&#8217;s misleading to suggest that the ABI report finds a correlation between poor performance and tax-reducing offshore structures.</p>
<p>[isn't the reason all major corporate failures have involved an offshore element simply because all major corporates *have* an offshore element? They've also all involved computers and people in suits, but it'd be hard to say that these were key factors in those firms' downfall...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tax Research LLP</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/02/28/my-delicious-bookmarks-for-february-27th/#comment-391376</link>
		<dc:creator>Tax Research LLP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/02/28/my-delicious-bookmarks-for-february-27th/#comment-391376</guid>
		<description>John

Offshoring is not the same as going offshore, in fact far from it.

The reality is that use of offshore can be a sign of poor governance. Think of all recent major corporate failures (Northern Rock included) and note that all involved an offshore element in the cause of downfall.

Richard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John</p>
<p>Offshoring is not the same as going offshore, in fact far from it.</p>
<p>The reality is that use of offshore can be a sign of poor governance. Think of all recent major corporate failures (Northern Rock included) and note that all involved an offshore element in the cause of downfall.</p>
<p>Richard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john b</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/02/28/my-delicious-bookmarks-for-february-27th/#comment-391037</link>
		<dc:creator>john b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 13:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/02/28/my-delicious-bookmarks-for-february-27th/#comment-391037</guid>
		<description>Having read the ABI report, &lt;a href="http://www.abi.org.uk/Members/circulars/viewAttachment.asp?EID=18935&#38;DID=15815" rel="nofollow"&gt;it's clear that offshoring is not a sign of bad governance&lt;/a&gt; in their definition.

You may believe offshoring to be a sign of bad governance, but it's misleading to imply that the ABI has suggested that offshoring leads to poor share performance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having read the ABI report, <a href="http://www.abi.org.uk/Members/circulars/viewAttachment.asp?EID=18935&amp;DID=15815" rel="nofollow">it&#8217;s clear that offshoring is not a sign of bad governance</a> in their definition.</p>
<p>You may believe offshoring to be a sign of bad governance, but it&#8217;s misleading to imply that the ABI has suggested that offshoring leads to poor share performance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
