Comments on: Murphy v Mitchell http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/02/04/murphy-v-mitchell/ Richard Murphy on tax and corporate accountability Wed, 08 Oct 2008 03:13:53 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: Naomi Comerford http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/02/04/murphy-v-mitchell/#comment-379302 Naomi Comerford Tue, 12 Feb 2008 17:16:04 +0000 http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/02/04/murphy-v-mitchell/#comment-379302 Roger Rabbit, You can hear this debate live at the 6th OffshoreAlert Financial Due Diligence Conference: 'The Unexpurgated Offshore' this April 13 - 15, 2008 in Ft. Lauderdale, FL USA. For more information visit the official conference website at http://www.offshorealertconference.com Roger Rabbit,

You can hear this debate live at the 6th OffshoreAlert Financial Due Diligence Conference: ‘The Unexpurgated Offshore’ this April 13 - 15, 2008 in Ft. Lauderdale, FL USA.

For more information visit the official conference website at http://www.offshorealertconference.com

]]> By: Azra http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/02/04/murphy-v-mitchell/#comment-372150 Azra Wed, 06 Feb 2008 09:56:05 +0000 http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/02/04/murphy-v-mitchell/#comment-372150 Richard Hay is a lawyer who thinks he can do economics and statistics. See http://www.jerseyfinance.je/_support/uploadedFiles/008%20-%20Richard%20Hay%2024.04.07.ppt#1 for a recent presentation of his where he claimed for instance that that lowering coprporate taxes increased (global) revenues in developped countries, based on a graph. No correlation coefficient, no Pearson's r, no claim for increased volume, no causality, no nothing. Richard Hay is a lawyer who thinks he can do economics and statistics.
See http://www.jerseyfinance.je/_support/uploadedFiles/008%20-%20Richard%20Hay%2024.04.07.ppt#1 for a recent presentation of his where he claimed for instance that that lowering coprporate taxes increased (global) revenues in developped countries, based on a graph. No correlation coefficient, no Pearson’s r, no claim for increased volume, no causality, no nothing.

]]> By: Chris Steel http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/02/04/murphy-v-mitchell/#comment-371429 Chris Steel Tue, 05 Feb 2008 21:01:47 +0000 http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/02/04/murphy-v-mitchell/#comment-371429 Best news I have heard in a very long time. Murphy and Blum 10 : Mitchell and hey 0 and thats meant to be a British socker score. Richard, Mitchell and hey are minos compared to Rubishka, who you destroyed in 2006. Best news I have heard in a very long time. Murphy and Blum 10 : Mitchell and hey 0 and thats meant to be a British socker score.

Richard, Mitchell and hey are minos compared to Rubishka, who you destroyed in 2006.

]]> By: roger rabbit http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/02/04/murphy-v-mitchell/#comment-370095 roger rabbit Mon, 04 Feb 2008 17:24:59 +0000 http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/02/04/murphy-v-mitchell/#comment-370095 Richard - would be interested in hearing this or seeing a transcript/report if poss when it happens. Watch out - Florida has about as many 'gators living there as people. Richard - would be interested in hearing this or seeing a transcript/report if poss when it happens.

Watch out - Florida has about as many ‘gators living there as people.

]]>