<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Zambia reclaims its right to tax copper</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/01/18/zambia-reclaims-its-right-to-tax-copper/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/01/18/zambia-reclaims-its-right-to-tax-copper/</link>
	<description>Richard Murphy on tax and corporate accountability</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 21:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alastair</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/01/18/zambia-reclaims-its-right-to-tax-copper/#comment-361187</link>
		<dc:creator>Alastair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/01/18/zambia-reclaims-its-right-to-tax-copper/#comment-361187</guid>
		<description>I am tracking this development in detail via a blog on the website www.minewatchzambia.com 
If you want detail on why Zambia is absolutely right to rip up the Development Agreements (and it's not yet clear that's what they are doing - the Finance Minister is probably on his feet offering more detail via the annual budget announcement as I type this) have a look at the original report 'For Whom the Windfalls?' also available on that site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am tracking this development in detail via a blog on the website <a href="http://www.minewatchzambia.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.minewatchzambia.com</a><br />
If you want detail on why Zambia is absolutely right to rip up the Development Agreements (and it&#8217;s not yet clear that&#8217;s what they are doing - the Finance Minister is probably on his feet offering more detail via the annual budget announcement as I type this) have a look at the original report &#8216;For Whom the Windfalls?&#8217; also available on that site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What a Result!</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/01/18/zambia-reclaims-its-right-to-tax-copper/#comment-355207</link>
		<dc:creator>What a Result!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 18:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/01/18/zambia-reclaims-its-right-to-tax-copper/#comment-355207</guid>
		<description>[...] Richard Murphy supports governments unilaterally breaching contracts, does [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Richard Murphy supports governments unilaterally breaching contracts, does [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hatfield girl</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/01/18/zambia-reclaims-its-right-to-tax-copper/#comment-355132</link>
		<dc:creator>hatfield girl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/01/18/zambia-reclaims-its-right-to-tax-copper/#comment-355132</guid>
		<description>One way in which the Zambian government could avoid a resulting and inappropriate strengthening of the kwacha and domestic inflationary pressures would be the setting up of a sovereign fund whose proceeds could be used to alleviate poverty and fund health and education, rather than suffering the driving down of agricultural exports as happened recently even under the old tax regime, with rises in mineral resources prices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One way in which the Zambian government could avoid a resulting and inappropriate strengthening of the kwacha and domestic inflationary pressures would be the setting up of a sovereign fund whose proceeds could be used to alleviate poverty and fund health and education, rather than suffering the driving down of agricultural exports as happened recently even under the old tax regime, with rises in mineral resources prices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tax Research LLP</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/01/18/zambia-reclaims-its-right-to-tax-copper/#comment-355130</link>
		<dc:creator>Tax Research LLP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/01/18/zambia-reclaims-its-right-to-tax-copper/#comment-355130</guid>
		<description>Vice

You're right - million, not billion

Corrected now

And greetings!

Richard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vice</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right - million, not billion</p>
<p>Corrected now</p>
<p>And greetings!</p>
<p>Richard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vice Yu</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/01/18/zambia-reclaims-its-right-to-tax-copper/#comment-355116</link>
		<dc:creator>Vice Yu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/01/18/zambia-reclaims-its-right-to-tax-copper/#comment-355116</guid>
		<description>Hi Richard,

Thanks for this post. Just a quick clarification ... I gather you mean "US$630 MILLION" rather than the "US$650 BILLION" indicated in the post above.

Vice</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Richard,</p>
<p>Thanks for this post. Just a quick clarification &#8230; I gather you mean &#8220;US$630 MILLION&#8221; rather than the &#8220;US$650 BILLION&#8221; indicated in the post above.</p>
<p>Vice</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
