<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama: what this man is for</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/01/09/obama-what-this-man-is-for/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/01/09/obama-what-this-man-is-for/</link>
	<description>Richard Murphy on tax and corporate accountability</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 22:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tax Research LLP</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/01/09/obama-what-this-man-is-for/#comment-400338</link>
		<dc:creator>Tax Research LLP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 14:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/01/09/obama-what-this-man-is-for/#comment-400338</guid>
		<description>Agreed

But maybe that will have to change too - will US investors put up with the rubbish Delaware feeds them after a banking crisis?

Richard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed</p>
<p>But maybe that will have to change too - will US investors put up with the rubbish Delaware feeds them after a banking crisis?</p>
<p>Richard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/01/09/obama-what-this-man-is-for/#comment-400329</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 14:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2008/01/09/obama-what-this-man-is-for/#comment-400329</guid>
		<description>But is it not the case that Obama's proposals are governed by national interest, to the extent where he would be willing to ignore the in-shore tax regimes of Delaware and Alaska for example?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But is it not the case that Obama&#8217;s proposals are governed by national interest, to the extent where he would be willing to ignore the in-shore tax regimes of Delaware and Alaska for example?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
