<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Defining corruption</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/12/14/defining-corruption/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/12/14/defining-corruption/</link>
	<description>Richard Murphy on tax and corporate accountability</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 22:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tax Research UK / 2008 - a year in prospect</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/12/14/defining-corruption/#comment-338137</link>
		<dc:creator>Tax Research UK / 2008 - a year in prospect</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 07:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/12/14/defining-corruption/#comment-338137</guid>
		<description>[...] debate on corruption will make progress, and the supply side will be increasingly taken into account when this issue is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] debate on corruption will make progress, and the supply side will be increasingly taken into account when this issue is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
