<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It could only happen in Jersey</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/11/26/it-could-only-happen-in-jersey/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/11/26/it-could-only-happen-in-jersey/</link>
	<description>Richard Murphy on tax and corporate accountability</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 01:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tax Research UK / The IMF are coming - let&#8217;s get the prosecutions rolling</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/11/26/it-could-only-happen-in-jersey/#comment-339275</link>
		<dc:creator>Tax Research UK / The IMF are coming - let&#8217;s get the prosecutions rolling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 09:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/11/26/it-could-only-happen-in-jersey/#comment-339275</guid>
		<description>[...] a result - which is sure evidence for me that external pressure works. And they have prosecuted one unqualified accountant for money laundering, which follows the normal pattern amongst the professions of picking on a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a result - which is sure evidence for me that external pressure works. And they have prosecuted one unqualified accountant for money laundering, which follows the normal pattern amongst the professions of picking on a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It could only happen in Jersey : FX Press Release</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/11/26/it-could-only-happen-in-jersey/#comment-289452</link>
		<dc:creator>It could only happen in Jersey : FX Press Release</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 05:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/11/26/it-could-only-happen-in-jersey/#comment-289452</guid>
		<description>[...] It could only happen in Jersey 26-Nov-07 Earlier this year an accountant in Jersey was found guilty of money laundering £27 million. Let’s be clear: Peter Michel was no big time player, and he did work pretty much alone. A perfect target for prosecution therefore. But now he’s appealed, and the grounds for his appeal could only have arisen in Jersey. He is claiming that the Judge who heard his case, Sir Geoffrey Nice was biased because he didn’t like tax havens. According to a recent Jersey &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It could only happen in Jersey 26-Nov-07 Earlier this year an accountant in Jersey was found guilty of money laundering £27 million. Let’s be clear: Peter Michel was no big time player, and he did work pretty much alone. A perfect target for prosecution therefore. But now he’s appealed, and the grounds for his appeal could only have arisen in Jersey. He is claiming that the Judge who heard his case, Sir Geoffrey Nice was biased because he didn’t like tax havens. According to a recent Jersey &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It could only happen in Jersey : FX Press Release</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/11/26/it-could-only-happen-in-jersey/#comment-289453</link>
		<dc:creator>It could only happen in Jersey : FX Press Release</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 05:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/11/26/it-could-only-happen-in-jersey/#comment-289453</guid>
		<description>[...] It could only happen in Jersey 26-Nov-07 Earlier this year an accountant in Jersey was found guilty of money laundering £27 million. Let’s be clear: Peter Michel was no big time player, and he did work pretty much alone. A perfect target for prosecution therefore. But now he’s appealed, and the grounds for his appeal could only have arisen in Jersey. He is claiming that the Judge who heard his case, Sir Geoffrey Nice was biased because he didn’t like tax havens. According to a recent Jersey &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It could only happen in Jersey 26-Nov-07 Earlier this year an accountant in Jersey was found guilty of money laundering £27 million. Let’s be clear: Peter Michel was no big time player, and he did work pretty much alone. A perfect target for prosecution therefore. But now he’s appealed, and the grounds for his appeal could only have arisen in Jersey. He is claiming that the Judge who heard his case, Sir Geoffrey Nice was biased because he didn’t like tax havens. According to a recent Jersey &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
