<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Capital Gains Tax after the Pre-Budget Report</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/10/21/capital-gains-tax-after-the-pre-budget-report/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/10/21/capital-gains-tax-after-the-pre-budget-report/</link>
	<description>Richard Murphy on tax and corporate accountability</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 04:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Capital Gains Tax - Now where? &#124; Holden Associates Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/10/21/capital-gains-tax-after-the-pre-budget-report/#comment-235336</link>
		<dc:creator>Capital Gains Tax - Now where? &#124; Holden Associates Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 15:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/10/21/capital-gains-tax-after-the-pre-budget-report/#comment-235336</guid>
		<description>[...] Richard Murphy suggested some, and I my humble opinion, very good and well reasoned alterations to the application of the newly proposed 18% capital gains tax charge, and they really are good! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Richard Murphy suggested some, and I my humble opinion, very good and well reasoned alterations to the application of the newly proposed 18% capital gains tax charge, and they really are good! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dane Clouston</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/10/21/capital-gains-tax-after-the-pre-budget-report/#comment-231775</link>
		<dc:creator>Dane Clouston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 20:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/10/21/capital-gains-tax-after-the-pre-budget-report/#comment-231775</guid>
		<description>Not my subject, but seems brilliant to me.  

As a possible separate thread, supposing I were Liberal Chancellor of the Exchequer and had introduced British Universal Inheritance, in order to spread more widely the private ownership of starting-line wealth in each succeeding generation - making the taxation of inheritance and capital gifts a lifetime gain, not a pain, for  all who would otherwise inherit less than the national average wealth. All national-born citizens to inherit (at 25) at least 10 per cent of average national wealth (£90,000 in the UK), means tested, subject to and financed by a progressive lifetime Capital Receipts Tax starting at 10 per cent.  Drop the 40 per cent rate of the exemption-ridden so-called 'Inheritance Tax' to 10 per cent without exemptions and keep it in being for record and withholding purposes.  Allow 'Inheritance Tax' paid by donors to be deducted from Capital Receipts Tax due from recipients.  Exempt intra-generational transfers between partners, spouses and cohabiting siblings.

 Would you be prepared, hypothetically, to propose improvements in response to the objections that I would receive?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not my subject, but seems brilliant to me.  </p>
<p>As a possible separate thread, supposing I were Liberal Chancellor of the Exchequer and had introduced British Universal Inheritance, in order to spread more widely the private ownership of starting-line wealth in each succeeding generation - making the taxation of inheritance and capital gifts a lifetime gain, not a pain, for  all who would otherwise inherit less than the national average wealth. All national-born citizens to inherit (at 25) at least 10 per cent of average national wealth (£90,000 in the UK), means tested, subject to and financed by a progressive lifetime Capital Receipts Tax starting at 10 per cent.  Drop the 40 per cent rate of the exemption-ridden so-called &#8216;Inheritance Tax&#8217; to 10 per cent without exemptions and keep it in being for record and withholding purposes.  Allow &#8216;Inheritance Tax&#8217; paid by donors to be deducted from Capital Receipts Tax due from recipients.  Exempt intra-generational transfers between partners, spouses and cohabiting siblings.</p>
<p> Would you be prepared, hypothetically, to propose improvements in response to the objections that I would receive?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily Coltman</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/10/21/capital-gains-tax-after-the-pre-budget-report/#comment-231730</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily Coltman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 19:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/10/21/capital-gains-tax-after-the-pre-budget-report/#comment-231730</guid>
		<description>The Chancellor seems hell bent on squeezing small businesses.  I could put forward cynical views as to why that is.

I would agree with Richard's suggestions.  They seem to me to make sure that people who start up one company, wind it up at very favourable tax rates and start up another one, will get stopped in their tracks.  But those who are genuinely in business for the long haul get tax breaks when they sell their business and retire.

M</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Chancellor seems hell bent on squeezing small businesses.  I could put forward cynical views as to why that is.</p>
<p>I would agree with Richard&#8217;s suggestions.  They seem to me to make sure that people who start up one company, wind it up at very favourable tax rates and start up another one, will get stopped in their tracks.  But those who are genuinely in business for the long haul get tax breaks when they sell their business and retire.</p>
<p>M</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
