<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Tax Justice Network Code of Conduct for Taxation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/10/18/the-tax-justice-network-code-of-conduct-for-taxation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/10/18/the-tax-justice-network-code-of-conduct-for-taxation/</link>
	<description>Richard Murphy on tax and corporate accountability</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 00:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tax Research UK / KPMG - pointing the finger of blame in the wrong direction</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/10/18/the-tax-justice-network-code-of-conduct-for-taxation/#comment-410144</link>
		<dc:creator>Tax Research UK / KPMG - pointing the finger of blame in the wrong direction</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 06:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/10/18/the-tax-justice-network-code-of-conduct-for-taxation/#comment-410144</guid>
		<description>[...] society. I&#8217;d urge him to sign his firm up, globally, to a Code of Conduct of the sort the Tax Justice Network has proposed. Then we&#8217;d be making progress. This requires firms like his own (and all its numerous tax [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] society. I&#8217;d urge him to sign his firm up, globally, to a Code of Conduct of the sort the Tax Justice Network has proposed. Then we&#8217;d be making progress. This requires firms like his own (and all its numerous tax [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dirk</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/10/18/the-tax-justice-network-code-of-conduct-for-taxation/#comment-400896</link>
		<dc:creator>dirk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/10/18/the-tax-justice-network-code-of-conduct-for-taxation/#comment-400896</guid>
		<description>Hope you'll excuse my poor English ; I am not a native speaker.

The debate about cause and effect is a tricky one and it may prove useless.

It is generally acknowledged that tax avoidance shifts the tax burden en thus installs a factual inequality. This is one reason tax avoidance is undesirable.

An interesting angle to view this problem is the question whether there is an obligation to obey the (tax) law. Some say that such an oblgation does exist, as the government usually knows better how to achieve wellfare for every one than we do. Some say there is no such obligation because not every statute or law has inherent moral value. Moreover, the tax avoider does by definition not break the law, he outsmarts it.

Legally tax avoidance is accepted because of two interacting principles :
- the principle of legality, according to which no tax shall be levied than by law
- the freedom of contract, according to which anyone can make any contract at any time 

The main legal question is to find out whether those principles still have the quasi absolute meaning they had in the 18th century, or whether they should be seen in their present-day context.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hope you&#8217;ll excuse my poor English ; I am not a native speaker.</p>
<p>The debate about cause and effect is a tricky one and it may prove useless.</p>
<p>It is generally acknowledged that tax avoidance shifts the tax burden en thus installs a factual inequality. This is one reason tax avoidance is undesirable.</p>
<p>An interesting angle to view this problem is the question whether there is an obligation to obey the (tax) law. Some say that such an oblgation does exist, as the government usually knows better how to achieve wellfare for every one than we do. Some say there is no such obligation because not every statute or law has inherent moral value. Moreover, the tax avoider does by definition not break the law, he outsmarts it.</p>
<p>Legally tax avoidance is accepted because of two interacting principles :<br />
- the principle of legality, according to which no tax shall be levied than by law<br />
- the freedom of contract, according to which anyone can make any contract at any time </p>
<p>The main legal question is to find out whether those principles still have the quasi absolute meaning they had in the 18th century, or whether they should be seen in their present-day context.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tax Research UK / What I want from the budget</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/10/18/the-tax-justice-network-code-of-conduct-for-taxation/#comment-396774</link>
		<dc:creator>Tax Research UK / What I want from the budget</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/10/18/the-tax-justice-network-code-of-conduct-for-taxation/#comment-396774</guid>
		<description>[...] A commitment to introduce a general anti-avoidance principle to tackle tax [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A commitment to introduce a general anti-avoidance principle to tackle tax [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tax Research UK / Tax havens harm Africa, and accountants could stop it</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/10/18/the-tax-justice-network-code-of-conduct-for-taxation/#comment-348630</link>
		<dc:creator>Tax Research UK / Tax havens harm Africa, and accountants could stop it</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/10/18/the-tax-justice-network-code-of-conduct-for-taxation/#comment-348630</guid>
		<description>[...] It&#8217;s why we have promoted our Code of Conduct. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It&#8217;s why we have promoted our Code of Conduct. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tax Research UK / Taxpayer&#8217;s Charter: make it a Code of Conduct</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/10/18/the-tax-justice-network-code-of-conduct-for-taxation/#comment-347286</link>
		<dc:creator>Tax Research UK / Taxpayer&#8217;s Charter: make it a Code of Conduct</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 14:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/10/18/the-tax-justice-network-code-of-conduct-for-taxation/#comment-347286</guid>
		<description>[...] I would like to think that it will look like this: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I would like to think that it will look like this: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tax Research UK / Russian corruption?</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/10/18/the-tax-justice-network-code-of-conduct-for-taxation/#comment-277718</link>
		<dc:creator>Tax Research UK / Russian corruption?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 11:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/10/18/the-tax-justice-network-code-of-conduct-for-taxation/#comment-277718</guid>
		<description>[...] Of course, if countries subscribed to the TJN Code of Conduct for Taxation such secrecy would not be available, and corruption of this sort may not be possible. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Of course, if countries subscribed to the TJN Code of Conduct for Taxation such secrecy would not be available, and corruption of this sort may not be possible. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tax Research UK / India tackles Vodafone offshore abuse</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/10/18/the-tax-justice-network-code-of-conduct-for-taxation/#comment-247580</link>
		<dc:creator>Tax Research UK / India tackles Vodafone offshore abuse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 10:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/10/18/the-tax-justice-network-code-of-conduct-for-taxation/#comment-247580</guid>
		<description>[...] After all, why should it be that because the ownership of shares is registered in a company wholly owned by the onshore participants to a deal no tax is due? This is a charade or sham at best. And Vodafone knows it. It would, of course, contravene the TJN Code of Conduct. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] After all, why should it be that because the ownership of shares is registered in a company wholly owned by the onshore participants to a deal no tax is due? This is a charade or sham at best. And Vodafone knows it. It would, of course, contravene the TJN Code of Conduct. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Getting it wrong on IFRS/GAAP convergence : AccMan</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/10/18/the-tax-justice-network-code-of-conduct-for-taxation/#comment-244474</link>
		<dc:creator>Getting it wrong on IFRS/GAAP convergence : AccMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 00:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/10/18/the-tax-justice-network-code-of-conduct-for-taxation/#comment-244474</guid>
		<description>[...] On this I can agree. Issues over the handling of tax in accounts for example could definitely do with review. A code of ethics that matters would also help. And it is true to say that the obdurate manner with which certain EU governments have chosen to step around IFRS or provide their own interpretations does not bode well. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] On this I can agree. Issues over the handling of tax in accounts for example could definitely do with review. A code of ethics that matters would also help. And it is true to say that the obdurate manner with which certain EU governments have chosen to step around IFRS or provide their own interpretations does not bode well. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tax Research LLP</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/10/18/the-tax-justice-network-code-of-conduct-for-taxation/#comment-223826</link>
		<dc:creator>Tax Research LLP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 15:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/10/18/the-tax-justice-network-code-of-conduct-for-taxation/#comment-223826</guid>
		<description>Alastair

Debate is very welcome.

What is not is debate about the desirability of democracy.

That is taken as a given on this site.

Richard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alastair</p>
<p>Debate is very welcome.</p>
<p>What is not is debate about the desirability of democracy.</p>
<p>That is taken as a given on this site.</p>
<p>Richard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alastair</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/10/18/the-tax-justice-network-code-of-conduct-for-taxation/#comment-223779</link>
		<dc:creator>alastair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 15:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/10/18/the-tax-justice-network-code-of-conduct-for-taxation/#comment-223779</guid>
		<description>As you seem to be supressing comments I guess you don't want to debate this?  No skin off my nose!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you seem to be supressing comments I guess you don&#8217;t want to debate this?  No skin off my nose!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
