<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Chancellor goes for Arctic Systems</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/10/09/the-chancellor-goes-for-arctic-systems/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/10/09/the-chancellor-goes-for-arctic-systems/</link>
	<description>Richard Murphy on tax and corporate accountability</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 00:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kingmaker</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/10/09/the-chancellor-goes-for-arctic-systems/#comment-290707</link>
		<dc:creator>Kingmaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 20:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/10/09/the-chancellor-goes-for-arctic-systems/#comment-290707</guid>
		<description>I have no problem with income shifting for jointly held assets. 

It is normally even easier for unmarried individuals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no problem with income shifting for jointly held assets. </p>
<p>It is normally even easier for unmarried individuals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
