<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The pleasure of blogging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/08/29/ther-pleasure-of-blogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/08/29/ther-pleasure-of-blogging/</link>
	<description>Richard Murphy on tax and corporate accountability</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 18:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tax Research LLP</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/08/29/ther-pleasure-of-blogging/#comment-159277</link>
		<dc:creator>Tax Research LLP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 07:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/08/29/ther-pleasure-of-blogging/#comment-159277</guid>
		<description>Martin

Definitely amused, not upset

The coincidence of tax maven rhyming with tax haven appeals to me

Not that I see any fiscal advantages from the former!

Richard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Martin</p>
<p>Definitely amused, not upset</p>
<p>The coincidence of tax maven rhyming with tax haven appeals to me</p>
<p>Not that I see any fiscal advantages from the former!</p>
<p>Richard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin B. Tittle</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/08/29/ther-pleasure-of-blogging/#comment-158952</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin B. Tittle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 22:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/08/29/ther-pleasure-of-blogging/#comment-158952</guid>
		<description>Richard,

Thank you for your complimentary remarks.

Regarding your postscript, I blame William Safire for introducing me to the word "maven."  As your Wikipedia link to the word notes, Bill has used that term (tongue in cheek, I always thought) to describe himself in the "On Language" column he has written for the New York Times since the 1980s.  We in the U.S. who care about the English language are richer for his commentary.

Regards,
Martin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard,</p>
<p>Thank you for your complimentary remarks.</p>
<p>Regarding your postscript, I blame William Safire for introducing me to the word &#8220;maven.&#8221;  As your Wikipedia link to the word notes, Bill has used that term (tongue in cheek, I always thought) to describe himself in the &#8220;On Language&#8221; column he has written for the New York Times since the 1980s.  We in the U.S. who care about the English language are richer for his commentary.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Martin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
