<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The UK &#8216;tax amnesty&#8217;: HMRC swing into action</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/08/09/the-uk-tax-amnesty-hmrc-swing-into-action/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/08/09/the-uk-tax-amnesty-hmrc-swing-into-action/</link>
	<description>Richard Murphy on tax and corporate accountability</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 17:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tax Research LLP</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/08/09/the-uk-tax-amnesty-hmrc-swing-into-action/#comment-140061</link>
		<dc:creator>Tax Research LLP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 09:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/08/09/the-uk-tax-amnesty-hmrc-swing-into-action/#comment-140061</guid>
		<description>Dennis

I agree - and I can't see why the enquiry letter could not be sent in bulk - mailings were before the amnesty closed. I also think protective assessments should follow on the same basis.

Re getting rid of the domicile rule - HMRC do have a role. The problem is the Treasury. 

Richard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis</p>
<p>I agree - and I can&#8217;t see why the enquiry letter could not be sent in bulk - mailings were before the amnesty closed. I also think protective assessments should follow on the same basis.</p>
<p>Re getting rid of the domicile rule - HMRC do have a role. The problem is the Treasury. </p>
<p>Richard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Howlett</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/08/09/the-uk-tax-amnesty-hmrc-swing-into-action/#comment-140050</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Howlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 08:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/08/09/the-uk-tax-amnesty-hmrc-swing-into-action/#comment-140050</guid>
		<description>Assuming your numbers are right, this leaves HMRC with a mountain to climb. 28 weeks just to get initial enquiry letters out...hmm. Don't fancy the follow up rate given they're seriously strapped for resource.

On a point of detail - they're not the ones who get rid of the dom rule. It's our old friend GB who's not been too keen so far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Assuming your numbers are right, this leaves HMRC with a mountain to climb. 28 weeks just to get initial enquiry letters out&#8230;hmm. Don&#8217;t fancy the follow up rate given they&#8217;re seriously strapped for resource.</p>
<p>On a point of detail - they&#8217;re not the ones who get rid of the dom rule. It&#8217;s our old friend GB who&#8217;s not been too keen so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
