<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Darling - cheap jibes won&#8217;t do</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/07/22/darling-cheap-jibes-wont-do/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/07/22/darling-cheap-jibes-wont-do/</link>
	<description>Richard Murphy on tax and corporate accountability</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 02:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tax Research UK / Tax Haven UK - 2 - Bearer Shares</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/07/22/darling-cheap-jibes-wont-do/#comment-134070</link>
		<dc:creator>Tax Research UK / Tax Haven UK - 2 - Bearer Shares</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 08:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/07/22/darling-cheap-jibes-wont-do/#comment-134070</guid>
		<description>[...] Alistair Darling has said the UK is not a tax haven. That is not true. It is, using any reasonable definition, including that which I proposed recently. I&#8217;ve already suggested one obvious reason why it is, which is the existence of the domicile rule, so let&#8217;s take a second example that is less obvious. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Alistair Darling has said the UK is not a tax haven. That is not true. It is, using any reasonable definition, including that which I proposed recently. I&#8217;ve already suggested one obvious reason why it is, which is the existence of the domicile rule, so let&#8217;s take a second example that is less obvious. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
