<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tax and corruption</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/02/07/tax-and-corruption/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/02/07/tax-and-corruption/</link>
	<description>Richard Murphy on tax and corporate accountability</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 04:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tax Research LLP</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/02/07/tax-and-corruption/#comment-10015</link>
		<dc:creator>Tax Research LLP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 13:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/02/07/tax-and-corruption/#comment-10015</guid>
		<description>Dennis

Strange. Everyone else reckons our definition is new, at least in this area where the Transparency International view has prevailed for too long. 

For the differneces, read the paper or chapter 2 of Closing the Floodgates.

Richard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis</p>
<p>Strange. Everyone else reckons our definition is new, at least in this area where the Transparency International view has prevailed for too long. </p>
<p>For the differneces, read the paper or chapter 2 of Closing the Floodgates.</p>
<p>Richard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Howlett</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/02/07/tax-and-corruption/#comment-10013</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Howlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 13:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2007/02/07/tax-and-corruption/#comment-10013</guid>
		<description>I'm not sure it's exactly new Richard. The language of corruption is inevitably linked ot commercial interests. There does however seem to have been a pretty much blanket exception in the case of the banking fraternity. BICC aside.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure it&#8217;s exactly new Richard. The language of corruption is inevitably linked ot commercial interests. There does however seem to have been a pretty much blanket exception in the case of the banking fraternity. BICC aside.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
