<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The more you have the easier it is to avoid tax</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2006/09/29/the-more-you-have-the-easier-it-is-to-avoid-tax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2006/09/29/the-more-you-have-the-easier-it-is-to-avoid-tax/</link>
	<description>Richard Murphy on tax and corporate accountability</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 06:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: david barker</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2006/09/29/the-more-you-have-the-easier-it-is-to-avoid-tax/#comment-2420</link>
		<dc:creator>david barker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 18:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2006/09/29/the-more-you-have-the-easier-it-is-to-avoid-tax/#comment-2420</guid>
		<description>Several points here. 
I am not looking at moral judgement but asking what is the solution? Taxation at whim?
This person was obeying the tax law as it stands. If not, I am sure the IRS would have taken him to the cleaners.
I do not understand tax`law is to be obeyed. If no tax is payable on a transaction then it is being obeyed. Thats called rule of law. Just taxing something because "it should be" is unlawful.
Governement waste a lot of money to promote their own (often politicians personal) interests. What social duty is there to pay them to waste money on my behalf?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several points here.<br />
I am not looking at moral judgement but asking what is the solution? Taxation at whim?<br />
This person was obeying the tax law as it stands. If not, I am sure the IRS would have taken him to the cleaners.<br />
I do not understand tax`law is to be obeyed. If no tax is payable on a transaction then it is being obeyed. Thats called rule of law. Just taxing something because &#8220;it should be&#8221; is unlawful.<br />
Governement waste a lot of money to promote their own (often politicians personal) interests. What social duty is there to pay them to waste money on my behalf?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tax Research LLP</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2006/09/29/the-more-you-have-the-easier-it-is-to-avoid-tax/#comment-2387</link>
		<dc:creator>Tax Research LLP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 09:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2006/09/29/the-more-you-have-the-easier-it-is-to-avoid-tax/#comment-2387</guid>
		<description>The solution is simple. We need a change of ethos. Paying tax is a 'good thing' not a 'bad hing'. Governments provide goods (not univesally, I know, but overall undoubtedly) and it's a social (if not moral) duty to pay for them. Tax law is there for a reason. It's to be obeyed. Government should not provide opprtunity for it to be avoided.

Good enough for starters?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The solution is simple. We need a change of ethos. Paying tax is a &#8216;good thing&#8217; not a &#8216;bad hing&#8217;. Governments provide goods (not univesally, I know, but overall undoubtedly) and it&#8217;s a social (if not moral) duty to pay for them. Tax law is there for a reason. It&#8217;s to be obeyed. Government should not provide opprtunity for it to be avoided.</p>
<p>Good enough for starters?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david barker</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2006/09/29/the-more-you-have-the-easier-it-is-to-avoid-tax/#comment-2362</link>
		<dc:creator>david barker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 23:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2006/09/29/the-more-you-have-the-easier-it-is-to-avoid-tax/#comment-2362</guid>
		<description>I have to ask what is the solution. Should he just be arbitarily taxed and the money confiscated?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to ask what is the solution. Should he just be arbitarily taxed and the money confiscated?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
