<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PWC&#8217;s total tax contribution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2006/08/24/pwcs-total-tax-contribution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2006/08/24/pwcs-total-tax-contribution/</link>
	<description>Richard Murphy on tax and corporate accountability</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 07:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tax Research UK / Biased misinformation - the PWC Total Tax Contribution 2007</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2006/08/24/pwcs-total-tax-contribution/#comment-295637</link>
		<dc:creator>Tax Research UK / Biased misinformation - the PWC Total Tax Contribution 2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 10:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2006/08/24/pwcs-total-tax-contribution/#comment-295637</guid>
		<description>[...] PWC have published their second report on what they call &#8220;the total tax contribution&#8221; of business. I&#8217;ve commented on this before. More than once. It&#8217;s illiterate in accounting terms. I&#8217;ll explain why in another post. It&#8217;s flawed in economic terms. It&#8217;s biased. And it fails to consider the impact of its findings. Apart from that, it&#8217;s a profound waste of the World Bank&#8217;s money. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PWC have published their second report on what they call &#8220;the total tax contribution&#8221; of business. I&#8217;ve commented on this before. More than once. It&#8217;s illiterate in accounting terms. I&#8217;ll explain why in another post. It&#8217;s flawed in economic terms. It&#8217;s biased. And it fails to consider the impact of its findings. Apart from that, it&#8217;s a profound waste of the World Bank&#8217;s money. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tax Research UK / Bob McIntyre on PWC&#8217;s Total Tax Contribution</title>
		<link>http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2006/08/24/pwcs-total-tax-contribution/#comment-472</link>
		<dc:creator>Tax Research UK / Bob McIntyre on PWC&#8217;s Total Tax Contribution</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 10:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2006/08/24/pwcs-total-tax-contribution/#comment-472</guid>
		<description>[...] PWC&#8217;s total tax contribution [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PWC&#8217;s total tax contribution [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
